[2016] KEHC 6769 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6769 (KLR)

The court found that since the parties had, by written consent, agreed to withdraw the application for transfer of the suit to the Environment and Land Division at Embu, there was no longer a live issue for determination. The consent was adopted as an order of the court, marking the application as settled. No order...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6769 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Royford Riungu Kuura; Plaintiff: Washington Kirimu Kuura; Plaintiff: Charles Nyaga Kuura; Defendant: M'Kuura Riria; Defendant: Tura Karinguri; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 147 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Transfer and Withdrawal by Consent
Outcome
Application withdrawn by consent and marked as settled. No order as to costs.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction, Venue of Trial
Source Language
en
Land and Property Transfer of Suit Jurisdiction Venue of Trial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Royford Riungu Kuura

Plaintiff

Washington Kirimu Kuura

Plaintiff

Charles Nyaga Kuura

Plaintiff

M'Kuura Riria

Defendant

Tura Karinguri

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Transfer and Withdrawal by Consent

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be transferred to the Environment and Land Division of the High Court at Embu for hearing and determination.
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded upon withdrawal of the application by consent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the parties had, by written consent, agreed to withdraw the application for transfer of the suit to the Environment and Land Division at Embu, there was no longer a live issue for determination. The consent was adopted as an order of the court, marking the application as settled. No order as to costs was made in respect of the withdrawn application. The court's decision was based on the principle that parties are at liberty to compromise or withdraw applications by consent, and such consent is binding and enforceable as an order of the court.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn by consent and marked as settled. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The application dated 9th December, 2015 is marked as settled by consent of the parties.
  • No costs are granted in respect of this application.