[2014] KEELRC 1357 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 1357 (KLR)

The court found that although the verifying affidavit predated the statement of claim, the explanation provided by the Claimant was reasonable and the error was not fatal. The court emphasized the constitutional imperative to administer justice without undue regard to technicalities. Accordingly, the court exercised...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 1357 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rupet Odera Ochieng; Respondent: Fairview Hotel Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 192 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out Claim
Outcome
respondent's application dismissed; claim saved subject to filing of further verifying affidavit
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Verifying Affidavit, Pleadings Irregularity, Curable Defect, Striking Out, Procedural Technicalities
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Verifying Affidavit Pleadings Irregularity Curable Defect Striking Out Procedural Technicalities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rupet Odera Ochieng

Applicant

Fairview Hotel Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out Claim

  1. 1 Whether the claim should be struck out due to the verifying affidavit predating the statement of claim.
  2. 2 Whether the error in the pleadings is a curable defect or a fatal flaw.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the verifying affidavit predated the statement of claim, the explanation provided by the Claimant was reasonable and the error was not fatal. The court emphasized the constitutional imperative to administer justice without undue regard to technicalities. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to save the claim and allowed the Claimant to file a further verifying affidavit within fourteen days. The Respondent's application to strike out the claim was dismissed.

Court Disposition

respondent's application dismissed; claim saved subject to filing of further verifying affidavit

Orders

  • The Respondent's application to strike out the claim is dismissed.
  • The Claimant is granted leave to file a further verifying affidavit within fourteen days from the date of the ruling.