[2002] KECA 48 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 48 (KLR)

The Court found that the application for stay of execution had been overtaken by events, making it unnecessary and academic to consider the merits. As a result, the application was dismissed as there was no longer a live issue for the court to determine.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 48 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Russel Company Ltd; Respondent: Land Development Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 4 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed as overtaken by events
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Russel Company Ltd

Applicant

Land Development Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution is still tenable given the subsequent developments in the case.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the application for stay of execution had been overtaken by events, making it unnecessary and academic to consider the merits. As a result, the application was dismissed as there was no longer a live issue for the court to determine.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as overtaken by events

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with no order as to costs.