[2021] KEHC 4859 (KLR)
The High Court found that the lower court erred by imposing a default sentence of 3 years imprisonment for non-payment of a fine, contrary to section 28(2) of the Penal Code, which prescribes a maximum of 12 months. Given the prosecution's concession and the applicant's reformation, the court exercised its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 4859 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Rustus Otieno Arum; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 240 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- application allowed; sentence revised to period already served; applicant to be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Revision, Default Sentence, Penal Code Section 28, Powers of High Court, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rustus Otieno Arum
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default sentence imposed by the lower court exceeded the statutory maximum under section 28(2) of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether the High Court should revise the sentence to the period already served.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the lower court erred by imposing a default sentence of 3 years imprisonment for non-payment of a fine, contrary to section 28(2) of the Penal Code, which prescribes a maximum of 12 months. Given the prosecution's concession and the applicant's reformation, the court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction under Article 165 of the Constitution and section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code to revise the sentence to the period already served, ordering the applicant's immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
application allowed; sentence revised to period already served; applicant to be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The sentence of the applicant is revised to the period already served.
- The applicant to be released forthwith unless lawfully held for any other reason.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINALAPPEALCASE240 OF 2019
RUSTUS OTIENO ARUM ........................................................APPLELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
This matter is coming up now for application of the applicant RUSTUS OTIENO ARUM, dated 30. 11. 2020. The application, brought under Articles 159 and 165 of the constitution seeks revision of the sentence of the lower court and an order that same be reduced to the period already served. Attached to the application is an affidavit of the applicant in which the applicant has deponed on his having reformed.
Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Oduor, in his submissions merely relied on the affidavit in support of the application.
In response to the application, Ms. Kibathi, for the state, submitted that the application be allowed to the extent that there exists an error in the sentence of the lower court. That on court I, the applicant had been sentenced to a fine of Ksh.600,000/= or in default to serve 3 years imprisonment, whereas, the default sentence ought to have been under section 28(2) of the Penal Code which stipulates for a maximum of 12 months imprisonment.
I have considered the application and the submissions of the 2 learned counsel. The application seems to target the default sentence to count I, ie the sentence of 3 years imprisonment.
The state Respondent has conceded to this application. Article 165 of the constitution declares the powers of revision that the High Court retains over the subordinate courts. The enabling procedural statute, the Criminal Procedure Code, Cap 75, at section 364, also gives directions as to the nature of the orders that the High Court may issue.
At section 364(1)(b)
“in the case of any order other than an order of acquittal, alter or reverse the order.”
In view of the fact that the prosecution is not opposed to this application, I allow the same. I accordingly revise the sentence of the applicant to the period already served. The applicant to be released forthwith unless lawfully.
D. O. OGEMBO
JUDGE
28. 7.2021.
Court:
Ruling read out in presence of the applicant (Nairobi West Prison), Mr. Oduor for the applicant and Mr. Kiragu for the state.
D. O. OGEMBO
JUDGE
28. 7.2021.
‘O’
FROM: HIGH COURT APPELLATE SIDE
TO: G.K. NAIROBI WEST PRISON @ GK.PRISON ALLO.
INFO: PHQ.
28TH JULY 2021
HCCRA 240 OF 2019
HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 240OF 2019 ORIGINATING FROM THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT MILIMANI CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1146 OF 2018. APPLICANT’S RUSTUS OTIENO ARUMTHE SENTENCE OF THE APPLELLANT IS REVISED TO THE PERIOD ALREADY SERVED. THE APPLICANT TO BE RELEASED FORTHWITH UNLESS LAWFULLY. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
stl