[2022] KEELC 2442 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 2442 (KLR)

The court found that the application to set aside the notice of withdrawal of proceedings and the consequential orders was meritorious, as the supporting affidavit's averments were uncontroverted and the application was not opposed by any party. The court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 2442 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lucy Ogoki Rutere & 34 others; Respondent: Muthithi Investment Limited; Respondent: Fuelex Limited; Respondent: Riverbank Limited; Respondent: Kandimugwa Limited; Interested Party: Inspector General of Police; Interested Party: Attorney General; Interested Party: Ethic and Anti-Corruption Commission; Interested Party: Nairobi City County
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 21 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application allowed; orders granted as per prayers 3 and 4 of the notice of motion.
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Proceedings, Setting Aside Orders, Unopposed Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Withdrawal of Proceedings Setting Aside Orders Unopposed Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lucy Ogoki Rutere & 34 others

Applicant

Muthithi Investment Limited

Respondent

Fuelex Limited

Respondent

Riverbank Limited

Respondent

Kandimugwa Limited

Respondent

Inspector General of Police

Interested Party

Attorney General

Interested Party

Ethic and Anti-Corruption Commission

Interested Party

Nairobi City County

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the notice of withdrawal of proceedings and the consequential orders should be set aside as null and void.
  2. 2 Whether the court should proceed with the fair trial and determination of the 4th Interested Party’s cross-petition and notice of motion as originally scheduled.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to set aside the notice of withdrawal of proceedings and the consequential orders was meritorious, as the supporting affidavit's averments were uncontroverted and the application was not opposed by any party. The court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought in prayers 3 and 4 of the notice of motion, thereby setting aside the impugned withdrawal and restoring the matter for fair trial and determination of the 4th Interested Party’s cross-petition and related applications.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; orders granted as per prayers 3 and 4 of the notice of motion.

Orders

  • The notice of withdrawal of proceedings dated February 14, 2022, and the order adopted and made thereon dated February 15, 2021, purportedly on behalf of the Plaintiff, are set aside, vacated, and held to be null and void together with all consequential orders thereon.
  • The court will proceed with the fair trial and determination of the 4th Interested Party’s cross-petition and notice of motion dated October 27, 2021 and November 5, 2021 as originally scheduled.