[2015] KEHC 3301 (KLR)
The court found that the amendments sought by the 1st and 2nd defendants were necessary to clarify the facts regarding the ownership and acquisition of the disputed land parcels. The inclusion of Timothy Mwingirwa Mutiga as a defendant was deemed indispensable for the just and final determination of the issues, as...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 3301 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ruth Mwari Kilemi; Plaintiff: Japhet Mutiga M’Rubi; Plaintiff: Isaiya M’Itubiri M’Ituma; Plaintiff: M’Mutiga M’Elimana; Defendant: Josphat Mwilaria; Defendant: Caxton Kaunyangi Ayub; Defendant: District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Tigania; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 203 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Defence and Join Party
- Outcome
- Application allowed by consent; amendments and joinder granted.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Land Ownership Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ruth Mwari Kilemi
Plaintiff
Japhet Mutiga M’Rubi
Plaintiff
Isaiya M’Itubiri M’Ituma
Plaintiff
M’Mutiga M’Elimana
Plaintiff
Josphat Mwilaria
Defendant
Caxton Kaunyangi Ayub
Defendant
District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Tigania
Defendant
Hon. Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Defence and Join Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st and 2nd defendants should be granted leave to amend their statements of defence to include additional facts regarding land parcels and acquisition.
- 2 Whether Timothy Mwingirwa Mutiga should be enjoined as the 5th defendant as an indispensable party.
- 3 Whether the amendments and joinder would prejudice the plaintiffs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the amendments sought by the 1st and 2nd defendants were necessary to clarify the facts regarding the ownership and acquisition of the disputed land parcels. The inclusion of Timothy Mwingirwa Mutiga as a defendant was deemed indispensable for the just and final determination of the issues, as he is alleged to have an interest in the suit land. Since the plaintiffs consented to the application and would not be prejudiced, the court exercised its discretion to allow the amendments and joinder. The court directed timelines for the filing of amended defences and plaint, and for substitution of the 2nd plaintiff, to ensure orderly progress of the case.
Court Disposition
Application allowed by consent; amendments and joinder granted.
Orders
- Defendants to amend their defences within 30 days.
- Plaintiffs to amend their plaint within 30 days of service of the amended defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
ENVIRONMENT AND LAND CASE NO.203 OF 2012
RUTH MWARI KILEMI.......................................................................1ST PLAINTIFF
JAPHET MUTIGA M’RUBI................................................................2ND PLAINTIFF
ISAIYA M’ITUBIRI M’ITUMA...........................................................3RD PLAINTIFF
M’MUTIGA M’ELIMANA................................................................4TH PLAINITTFF
VERSUS
JOSPHAT MWILARIA...................................................................1ST DEFENDANT
CAXTON KAUNYANGI AYUB......................................................2ND DEFENDANT
DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION &
SETTLEMENT OFFICER TIGANIA................................................. 3RD DEFENDANT
HON.ATTORNEY GENERAL............................................................. 4TH DEFENDANT
RULING
This Application is dated 30th June, 2015 and seeks Orders:-
THATthe 1st and 2nd Defendants/Applicants be granted leave to amend their statements of defence on record, in terms of the annexed draft amended statements of defence.
THATTimothy Mwingirwa Mutiga be enjoined in this case as the 5th Defendant
THATcosts of this Application be in the cause.
It is supported by the Affidavit of Josphat Mwilaria and Caxton Kanyangi Ayub and has the following grounds:-
THATthe 1st and 2nd Defendants’/Applicants’ statement of defence on record leave out pertinent facts like the numbers of their parcels of land and how they acquired them.
THATthe ground claimed by the Plaintiffs/Respondents actually belong to the 1st and 2nd Defendants & Timothy Mwingirwa Mutiga, whose presence in this case is indispensable. The three are relatives and their parcels of Land originate from their ancestral clan land.
THATthe afore-said details which are missing in the statements of defence are critical and cardinal in determining the true owners(s) of the suit lands on the ground.
THATthe amendment sought shall enable the Court to determine all the issues at variance amongst the parties effectually, once and for all and with finality.
THATthe Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced at all, by the relief sought.
On 22/07/2015, the parties by consent agreed that the Application be allowed.
In the Circumstances, it is allowed. I do direct as follows:
Defendants to amend their defences within 30 days of today and the Plaintiffs to amend their Plaint within 30 days of service upon them with the Defendants amended defence by the Defendants.
Plaintiffs to put in papers to substitute the 2nd Plaintiff within 30 days.
Costs shall be in the cause.
Upon achievement of the amendment of the defences and the Plaint, Parties to obtain a mutually convenient date for directions from the Registry.
Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 22nd day of July, 2015 in the presence of :-
Cc.: Lilian/Daniel
Gichunge for Plaintiffs
Mbaabu for Defendants
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE