[2015] KEHC 2256 (KLR)
The court found that both the petitioner and respondent had established grounds for dissolution of the marriage, including irretrievable breakdown, denial of conjugal rights, violence, and adultery. The evidence demonstrated that the parties had lived separately since 2005, maintained separate lives, and had no hope...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 2256 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: S K; Respondent: R W K
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 4 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition and cross petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- SJ Chitembwe
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Alimony, Child Custody
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S K
Petitioner
R W K
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has irretrievably broken down.
- 2 Whether grounds for dissolution of marriage have been established by both parties.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both the petitioner and respondent had established grounds for dissolution of the marriage, including irretrievable breakdown, denial of conjugal rights, violence, and adultery. The evidence demonstrated that the parties had lived separately since 2005, maintained separate lives, and had no hope of reconciliation. The court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and that both parties had proved their respective claims, warranting the dissolution of the marriage.
Court Disposition
petition and cross petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage between the parties is hereby dissolved.
- A decree nisi to issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MALINDI
DIVORCE CAUSE NO.4 OF 2005
S K….....................PETITIONER
VRS
R W K…................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The petition dated 2nd March, 2005 seeks the dissolution of the marriage between the parties herein. The respondent filed a reply and a cross petition dated 21st March 2005 also seeking the dissolution of the marriage. From the time the petition was filed, the divorce case was kept aside and parties dealt with the issue of alimony.
The petitioner's evidence is that the two got married in July 2001 at the District Commissioner's Office. They were blessed with one daughter aged twelve years. He filed the petition as the respondent was abusing him and accusing him of being a criminal. The parties live in the same house but on separate floors. He is 75 years old and sickly. He is the one taking care of the child.
The respondent also asked for the divorce. The child is in boarding school and when she is on holidays she stays with the respondent. The respondent testified that they got married on 13th July 2001. They were blessed with a baby girl. She too would like the marriage to be dissolved. According to her, the petitioner is violent and became a drunkard. At times, the petitioner goes to their matrimonial home accompanied by women. He would drink at the house bar with women. He lives upstairs while she lives downstairs with the child. Each cooks his/her own food and for all purposes lives separately. The have lived like that since 2005. It is the respondent's evidence that the petitioner has assaulted her on several occasions and reports have been made to the police.
The petitioner in his petition contends that he had been denied conjugal rights for two years before the petition was filed. On her part, the respondent accuses the petitioner of adultery and that he at times takes women to their matrimonial home. The answer to the petition gives details of the allegations of adultery and a name of one Esther is given.
From the evidence on record, it is clear that the marriage between the parties has hit rock bottom. It is only the matrimonial house which keep the parties together. Since 2005, parties have been living separately as if they are not married. Each party would like to start his/her life afresh. There is no hope of reconciliation. I do find that each party has proved his/her claim. The marriage has irretrievably broken down with no hope of sustaining it. There is no love between the two.
In the end, I do find that the petition and cross petition have been proved. The marriage between the parties herein is hereby dissolved. A decree nisi to issue. Each party to meet their own costs.
Dated, signed and delivered at Malindi this 8th day of October, 2015.
SAID J. CHITEMBWE
JUDGE