[2015] KEHC 792 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner and has not been seen or communicated for over eight years, which constitutes irretrievable breakdown of the marriage under Kenyan law. The respondent's drug abuse and violent conduct further contributed to the breakdown. The petitioner proved his case on a balance of probabilities, and the marriage, having ceased to exist in substance, was dissolved. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 792 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: S. M.; Respondent: J. M.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2015
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 15 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- SJ Chitembwe
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Desertion, Irretrievable Breakdown, Matrimonial Offences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. M.
Petitioner
J. M.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has broken down irretrievably.
- 2 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner, justifying dissolution of marriage under Kenyan law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner and has not been seen or communicated for over eight years, which constitutes irretrievable breakdown of the marriage under Kenyan law. The respondent's drug abuse and violent conduct further contributed to the breakdown. The petitioner proved his case on a balance of probabilities, and the marriage, having ceased to exist in substance, was dissolved. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent is hereby dissolved.
- A decree nisi to issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment