[2014] KEHC 1230 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established acts of cruelty by the respondent, including aggression, neglect of the children, and desertion of the matrimonial home. The respondent failed to respond to the petition despite proper service. The evidence demonstrated that the marriage had broken down...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 1230 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: S N; Respondent: S K T
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 163 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Cruelty, Child Custody, Irretrievable Breakdown, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S N
Petitioner
S K T
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner has proved acts of cruelty by the respondent to warrant dissolution of the marriage.
- 2 Whether the marriage has broken down irretrievably.
- 3 Whether the petitioner is entitled to custody of the children.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established acts of cruelty by the respondent, including aggression, neglect of the children, and desertion of the matrimonial home. The respondent failed to respond to the petition despite proper service. The evidence demonstrated that the marriage had broken down irretrievably and could not be salvaged. The court therefore granted the dissolution of the marriage and directed that issues of child custody be determined by the Children’s Court.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage celebrated between the petitioner and respondent on 23rd August 2004 is hereby dissolved.
- Decree Nisi dissolving the said marriage is issued to be made absolute thirty (30) days from the date of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 163 OF 2012
BETWEEN
S N ………………………..…………..……PETITIONER
AND
S K T ……………………………………RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
1. The Petitioner then a bachelor of Kenyan extraction and the Respondent then a spinster of Eritrean citizenry, were married on 23rd August 2004 at the Census and Civil Status Division of the Municipality of Keren in the Republic of Eretrea. A certificate of marriage serial Number [particulars withheld] was issued to them in accordance with the CIVIL LAW ART/603/604/606. The couple thereafter cohabited at Keren in Eriteria, Nakuru and Nairobi respectively. They were blessed with two issues of the marriage aged as follows at the time of filing the Petition:
K W N aged 7 years
B W N age 5 years
Both Petitioner and Respondent are domiciled in Kenya where the Petitioner works as a humanitarian aid worker in Nairobi, while the Respondent resides at an unknown place within the Republic of Kenya.
2. The Petition filed on 1st September 2012 is premised on grounds of cruelty. The acts of cruelty are said to have been visited upon the Petitioner by the Respondent. The Petitioner set out the particulars of cruelty and averred that the Respondent is a woman of violent disposition. That she is aggressive, has an uncontrollable temper and had treated the Petitioner with contempt, disdain, and hatred during their marriage. The Petitioner also asserted that the Respondent had on several occasions neglected the children of the marriage, with a view to subjecting the Petitioner to mental anguish and agony over the safety and wellbeing of his children. That the Respondent deserted the matrimonial home since the year 2011 and travelled to an unknown place with the children of the marriage without notifying the Petitioner.
3. The Petitioner confirms that this Petition has not been presented or prosecuted in collision with the Respondent, nor has he connived or condoned the cruel acts complained of. He also certified that there have been no previous proceedings filed regarding the marriage. The Respondent was served through substituted service through an advertisement in the Daily Nation on 13th March 2013. She was eventually served personally on 30th October 2013. She did not enter appearance or file an Answer to the Petition.
4. On 3rd July 2014 the Deputy Registrar certified that the matter was suitable to proceed for hearing as an undefended cause for one day in Nairobi. The Petitioner testified on 16th October 2014 and reiterated what he had set out in the Petition. In addition, he stated that as at the time of testifying he had no idea where the Respondent was living.
5. He prayed that the marriage be dissolved. The Petitioner further prayed that the custody of the children whose whereabouts are unknown and who now include Y N alias Y O aged 15 years, be granted to him.
6. From the foregoing it is evident that the marriage celebrated between the parties herein on 23rd August 2004 has broken down irretrievably and cannot be salvaged.
7. I therefore make orders as follows:
That the marriage celebrated between the Petitioner and Respondent at the Census and Civil Status Division of the Municipality of Keren in the Republic of Eretria on 23rd August 2004, is hereby dissolved.
That Decree Nisi dissolving the said marriage is hereby issued to be made absolute thirty (30) days from the date of this judgment.
That matters concerning the custody of the children shall be determined by the Chidren’s Court.
There shall be no orders as to costs.
SIGNED DATEDandDELIVEREDin open court this 27th day of November 2014.
…………………………………….
L. A. ACHODE
JUDGE