[2023] KEELC 18430 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 18430 (KLR)

The court found that the orders for stay of execution and security for costs granted on March 23, 2023, were conditional upon the appellants depositing Kshs 500,000 within thirty days. As the appellants failed to comply, the orders lapsed automatically on April 23, 2023. The court held that there were no subsisting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 18430 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Haron Ondicho Sagwe; Appellant: Veronica Nyamoita Makori; Respondent: Lucy Nancy Waithira; Respondent: Mary Nyambura Mbatia
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 3 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Security for Costs
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Security for Costs Stay of Execution Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Haron Ondicho Sagwe

Appellant

Veronica Nyamoita Makori

Appellant

Lucy Nancy Waithira

Respondent

Mary Nyambura Mbatia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Security for Costs

  1. 1 Whether the court should direct the appellants to deposit Kshs 500,000 as security for costs pending the hearing and determination of the application.
  2. 2 Whether there are any subsisting orders capable of extension regarding the stay of execution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders for stay of execution and security for costs granted on March 23, 2023, were conditional upon the appellants depositing Kshs 500,000 within thirty days. As the appellants failed to comply, the orders lapsed automatically on April 23, 2023. The court held that there were no subsisting orders capable of extension or revival. Consequently, the application seeking further directions or extension regarding security for costs was without merit and was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondents

Orders

  • The application dated April 20, 2023 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.