[2019] KEHC 12341 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant, having failed to file a defence or participate in the proceedings, was deemed to have admitted the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff provided documentary evidence supporting its entitlement to recover 40% of the insurance claim from the defendant under the reinsurance agreement....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 12341 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Saham Assurance Company Kenya Limited; Defendant: Trident Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 389 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Insurance Contracts, Reinsurance Liability, Breach of Contract, Damages, Interest Awards
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saham Assurance Company Kenya Limited
Plaintiff
Trident Insurance Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff 40% of the insurance claim as per the reinsurance agreement.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for the claimed sum, interest, and costs due to the defendant's failure to settle the amount.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant, having failed to file a defence or participate in the proceedings, was deemed to have admitted the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff provided documentary evidence supporting its entitlement to recover 40% of the insurance claim from the defendant under the reinsurance agreement. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff's claim was merited and that the defendant was liable for the outstanding sum, interest, and costs. Judgment was therefore entered for the plaintiff for the claimed amount, with interest at court rates from the date of filing suit until payment in full, and costs of the suit.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant for Ksh 33,427,695.61 with interest at court rate from the date of filing suit until payment in full.
- The plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION
CIVIL SUIT NO. 389 OF 2017
SAHAM ASSURANCE COMPANY KENYA LIMITED..................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
TRIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED............................................DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. SAHAM ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, the plaintiff filed this case against TRIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, the defendant. This case was referred to Mediation that is the court Annexed Mediation. The defendant failed to file a case summary in accordance with the Mediation Practice directions 2017 and on 13th June 2019. When the defendant was required to show cause why the court should not take action for its aforestated failure, the defendant failed to attend court. Accordingly the court, in the absence of any cause being shown by the defendant the defendant’s defence was on that date struck out.
2. The case proceeded for hearing on 17th September 2019 by way of plaintiff formally proving its case.
3. The evidence of the plaintiff was led by Sarah Weru the plaintiff’s senior legal officer.
4. The said witness stated in evidence that the plaintiff insured Tusker Mattresses Limited (Tuskys) for the period between 1st March 2015 and 1st March 2016. The defendant contractually took up 40% of the risk upon re-insuring Tuskys.
5. On 17th May 2015 one of Tuskys branches caught fire which led to claims being made by Tuskys for material damage and loss of profit. An adjuster was appointed and all reinsurers, including the defendant were notified. The material damage claim was adjusted at Ksh 67,517,001/= and the adjustment fee for that claim was Ksh 1,851,360/=. The defendant’s liability for 40% of the claim was Ksh 27,747. 40. The loss of profit was fully adjusted at Ksh 72,706,725/= and the adjusters fees was Ksh 928,000/= The defendant’s liability at 40% of that claim is Ksh 29,453,885. 60. The defendant on receiving demand to pay, from the plaintiff, only made partial payment. The defendant’s total liability together with interest and costs of recovery is Ksh 33,427,695. 61 as at 16th August, 2017.
6. The plaintiff has made several demands of settlement of the amount due but the defendant has failed to settle the same. It is on that basis plaintiff prays for judgment for Ksh 33,427,695. 61 as at 16th August 2017 together with interest and costs.
7. Since there is no defence to the plaintiff’s claim and because the plaintiff’s claim is supported by document, I find the plaintiff’s claim is merited.
CONCLUSION
8. Accordingly the judgment of the court is as follows:
9.
a. Judgment is hereby entered for the plaintiff against the defendant for Ksh 33,427,695. 61 with interest at court rate from the date of filing suit until payment in full.
b. The plaintiff is awarded costs of the suit.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this4thdayOCTOBER,2019.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Judgment ReadandDeliveredinOpen Courtin the presence of:
Sophie..................................COURT ASSISTANT
..........................................FOR THE PLAINTIFF
.......................................FOR THE DEFENDANT