[2019] KEHC 11671 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11671 (KLR)

The court held that following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The petitioner, having served 21 years in prison, demonstrated rehabilitation and positive conduct as evidenced by the Social...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11671 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Said Abeid Said; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 122 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment
Outcome
petition_allowed
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Robbery With Violence, Death Penalty, Constitutional Rights, Rehabilitation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Robbery With Violence Death Penalty Constitutional Rights Rehabilitation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Said Abeid Said

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecution

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing and immediate release based on time already served and evidence of rehabilitation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The petitioner, having served 21 years in prison, demonstrated rehabilitation and positive conduct as evidenced by the Social Inquiry Report and Prison Progress Report. The court found that the petitioner had suffered sufficient retribution and was reformed. Consequently, the court resentenced the petitioner to 21 years imprisonment, which he had already served, and ordered his immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.

Court Disposition

petition_allowed

Orders

  • The petitioner is resentenced to 21 years imprisonment.
  • Having served the entire sentence, the petitioner is to be forthwith set free and released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.