[2021] KEHC 5601 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5601 (KLR)

The court found that the sentence imposed on the petitioner was a mandatory minimum sentence under Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act. In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, which held that mandatory sentences that remove judicial discretion are unconstitutional, the court determined it had the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5601 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Said Bakari; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 186 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Petition / Resentencing Judgment
Outcome
sentence_varied
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Defilement, Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Sexual Offences Act, Mitigation, Constitutional Rights
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Defilement Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Sexual Offences Act Mitigation Constitutional Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Said Bakari

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition / Resentencing Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory minimum sentence for defilement under Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
  2. 2 Whether the circumstances of the petitioner warrant a reduction of the sentence imposed by the trial court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sentence imposed on the petitioner was a mandatory minimum sentence under Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act. In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, which held that mandatory sentences that remove judicial discretion are unconstitutional, the court determined it had the authority to review and interfere with the sentence. Considering the petitioner's mitigation, including his age at the time of the offence and evidence of reformation, the court set aside the original 15-year sentence and substituted it with a term of nine years' imprisonment from the date of arrest.

Court Disposition

sentence_varied

Orders

  • The sentence of 15 years imposed on the petitioner is set aside.
  • The petitioner shall serve a jail sentence of nine (9) years from the date of arrest.