[2002] KECA 126 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 126 (KLR)

Despite the absence of a good reason for the applicant's failure to serve the notice of appeal within the prescribed time under rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the court exercised its discretion to grant an extension of time. The court considered the interests of justice and allowed the period for service to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 126 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Salesio M'Aribu; Respondent: County Council
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 351 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application for extension of time granted.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Service of Notice of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Service of Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Salesio M'Aribu

Applicant

County Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to serve the notice of appeal despite non-compliance with rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

Despite the absence of a good reason for the applicant's failure to serve the notice of appeal within the prescribed time under rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the court exercised its discretion to grant an extension of time. The court considered the interests of justice and allowed the period for service to include the date when the notice was actually served on the respondent, thereby regularizing the late service. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time granted.

Orders

  • Time for serving the notice of appeal is extended to include 21st September, 2001, when the notice was served on the respondent.
  • No order as to costs.