[2019] KEELRC 821 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 821 (KLR)

The court found that the claimants had established, through uncontested pleadings, documents, and oral evidence, that they were employed by the respondents and were sent on indefinite leave due to business downturn, with a promise of recall that was never fulfilled. The respondents failed to appear, file a response,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 821 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Salif Michael Ngunguli; Applicant: Jacob Katumo Musyoki; Applicant: Nzomo Muluve Fredrick; Applicant: Pauline Khadiori; Applicant: Ibrahim Alumera Amimo; Applicant: John Nyaga Ireri; Applicant: Swaleh Kibwana; Applicant: Kelvin Murithi Njeru; Applicant: Kavesa Mary Mutua; Applicant: Gladys Akinyi Oduor; Applicant: Miland Njogu; Applicant: Alice Achieng Ochieng; Applicant: David Thoya Ndurya; Applicant: Dennice Odwor Odhiambo; Respondent: Hui Commercial Enterprise (Africa) Company Limited aka Hui Commercial; Respondent: Wrony Wang
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 394 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Redundancy, Terminal Benefits, Compensation for Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Redundancy Terminal Benefits Compensation for Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Salif Michael Ngunguli

Applicant

Jacob Katumo Musyoki

Applicant

Nzomo Muluve Fredrick

Applicant

Pauline Khadiori

Applicant

Ibrahim Alumera Amimo

Applicant

John Nyaga Ireri

Applicant

Swaleh Kibwana

Applicant

Kelvin Murithi Njeru

Applicant

Kavesa Mary Mutua

Applicant

Gladys Akinyi Oduor

Applicant

Miland Njogu

Applicant

Alice Achieng Ochieng

Applicant

David Thoya Ndurya

Applicant

Dennice Odwor Odhiambo

Applicant

Hui Commercial Enterprise (Africa) Company Limited aka Hui Commercial

Respondent

Wrony Wang

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimants' employment was terminated unfairly by the respondents on account of redundancy.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to redundancy benefits and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents complied with statutory requirements for redundancy and termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimants had established, through uncontested pleadings, documents, and oral evidence, that they were employed by the respondents and were sent on indefinite leave due to business downturn, with a promise of recall that was never fulfilled. The respondents failed to appear, file a response, or contest the evidence. The court held that the termination was unfair, as the respondents did not comply with statutory requirements for redundancy, including proper notice and payment of terminal dues. The claimants were entitled to terminal benefits and compensation for unfair termination as particularized in their claim.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • It is declared that termination was unfair.
  • The respondents shall pay to the claimants, jointly and severally, terminal benefits and compensation for unfair termination, totaling Kshs. 8,206,348.