[2018] KECA 235 (KLR)
The Court held that section 379(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly denies the right to bail pending appeal to persons sentenced to death. The Court of Appeal Rules, being subsidiary legislation, are subordinate to the Criminal Procedure Code. Therefore, the Court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail pending...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KECA 235 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Salim Hamisi alias Wepukhulu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 6 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application struck out as incompetent.
- Judges
- AM Githinji, GG Okwengu, A Mohammed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Death Sentence, Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Salim Hamisi alias Wepukhulu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant bail pending appeal to a person convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
- 2 Whether the application for bail pending appeal was properly brought under the correct rule of the Court of Appeal Rules.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal in light of section 379(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that section 379(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly denies the right to bail pending appeal to persons sentenced to death. The Court of Appeal Rules, being subsidiary legislation, are subordinate to the Criminal Procedure Code. Therefore, the Court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail pending appeal to the applicant, who has been convicted of murder and sentenced to death. The application, though brought under the wrong rule, is incompetent and must be struck out as the statutory bar is clear and binding.
Court Disposition
Application struck out as incompetent.
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: E.M. GITHINJI, HANNAH OKWENGU &
J. MOHAMMED, JJA.
CRIMINAL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 6 OF 2017
BETWEEN
SALIM HAMISI ALIAS WEPUKHULU............APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC..........................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Bungoma,
(Ali-Aroni, J.) dated 2nd March, 2017
in
H.C.CR.C. NO. 10 OF 2012)
**********************
RULING OF THE COURT
[1]This is an application for bail pending the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 77 of 2017.
The application is brought by Phaustine Makhoha who claims to be an attorney of the appellant under a power of Attorney. However, the application is supported by the affidavit of Salim HamisialiasWepukhulu, the applicant himself.
[2]The applicant states in the supporting affidavit that he was convicted by the High Court of the offence of Murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code and sentenced to death; that he has filed Criminal Appeal No. 77 of 2017; that he suffers from tuberculosis and diabetes; that the appeal has high chances of success and that during his trial he had been released on bail pending trial.
[3]Mr. Mule, the learned counsel for the respondent asked the Court to dismiss the application stating that it is difficult to say that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success in the absence of the record of appeal.
[4]The application is brought under Rule 5 (2) (b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
It should have been brought under Rule 5 (2) (a) which gives this Court power to order an appellant to be released on bail. The error is technical and does not prevent the Court from exercising jurisdiction conferred by Rule 5 (2) (a).
Section 379 of the Criminal Procedure Rules which governs appeals to this Court from the decision of the High Court in exercise of its original jurisdiction provides in section 379 (4):
“Save in a case where the appellant has been sentenced to death, a judge of the High Court or of the Court of Appeal, may, where an appeal to the Court of Appeal has been lodged under this section, grant bail pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.”
[5] The Court of Appeal Rules are a subsidiary legislation which is subordinate to the statute – that is - the Criminal Produce Code.
Thus Rule 5 (2) (a) is subject to section 379 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code which denies a right to bail pending appeal to persons sentenced to death.
Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution which gives an arrested person a right to be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions pending charge or trial does not apply to the appellant who is convicted for murder and already sentenced to death.
[6] For the foregoing reasons, the application being incompetent is stuck out.
DATED and Delivered at Kisumu this 25th day of October, 2018.
E. M. GITHINJI
………………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
HANNAH OKWENGU
…………………..….….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J. MOHAMMED
……………..…………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy
of the original
DEPUTY REGISTRAR