[2019] KEHC 1705 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 1705 (KLR)

The court determined that the dispute at hand, which arose from a lease agreement concerning the use and occupation of land (Plot No.517 Nambacha) for sugarcane farming, falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as established by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 13 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 1705 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Salim Hamisi Kisokoni; Respondent: Dismas Makokha Mangoli; Respondent: Sifina Naliaka Makokha
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 86 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for disposal.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Environment and Land Court, Land Disputes, Lease Agreements, Use and Occupation of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Jurisdiction of Environment and Land Court Land Disputes Lease Agreements Use and Occupation of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Salim Hamisi Kisokoni

Appellant

Dismas Makokha Mangoli

Respondent

Sifina Naliaka Makokha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to the use and occupation of, and title to, land.
  2. 2 Whether the dispute concerning a lease agreement over Plot No.517 Nambacha falls within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the dispute at hand, which arose from a lease agreement concerning the use and occupation of land (Plot No.517 Nambacha) for sugarcane farming, falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as established by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. The High Court, by virtue of Article 165(5) of the Constitution, is expressly divested of jurisdiction over such matters. Consequently, the High Court cannot entertain the appeal and must transfer it to the Environment and Land Court for determination.

Court Disposition

Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for disposal.

Orders

  • The appeal is transferred to the Environment and Land Court at Kakamega for disposal.