[2020] KEELRC 1541 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1541 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant had previously filed Mombasa Cause No 650 of 2017 against the same Respondent, seeking similar reliefs based on the same subject matter. The earlier suit remains pending, and the Claimant has not taken further steps in that matter. The court held that the present suit is sub-judice...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1541 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Salim Twairi; Respondent: Kwale International Sugar Company Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 824 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
claim struck out
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Sub Judice, Abuse of Court Process, Striking Out Suit
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Sub Judice Abuse of Court Process Striking Out Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Salim Twairi

Claimant

Kwale International Sugar Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit is sub-judice in light of a previously instituted suit between the same parties on the same subject matter.
  2. 2 Whether the current suit amounts to an abuse of the court process and should be struck out.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant had previously filed Mombasa Cause No 650 of 2017 against the same Respondent, seeking similar reliefs based on the same subject matter. The earlier suit remains pending, and the Claimant has not taken further steps in that matter. The court held that the present suit is sub-judice under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and amounts to an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the only appropriate course was to strike out the latter suit to prevent duplicity and uphold the integrity of judicial proceedings.

Court Disposition

claim struck out

Orders

  • Cause No 824 of 2017 is struck out.
  • No order as to costs.