[2019] KEELC 939 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 939 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs' application raised serious questions regarding the legality of the charge registered against the suit property after the death of the registered owner. Given the nature of the dispute and the reliefs sought, the court determined that the proper forum for hearing and final...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 939 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Sally Cheptoo Bwambok; Plaintiff: Christine Chemeli Tapkei; Defendant: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd; Defendant: Edwin Kiplimo Too
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 49 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application for Injunction; Directions on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Application for injunction—interim orders extended; matter transferred for hearing and disposal by the High Court.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Fraudulent Charge, Estate Administration, Jurisdiction, Statutory Notice, Title Dispute
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Injunctive Relief Fraudulent Charge Estate Administration Jurisdiction Statutory Notice Title Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sally Cheptoo Bwambok

Plaintiff

Christine Chemeli Tapkei

Plaintiff

Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd

Defendant

Edwin Kiplimo Too

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application for Injunction; Directions on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the sale of the suit property pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the charge registered against the suit property after the death of the registered owner is illegal or fraudulent.
  3. 3 Which court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs' application raised serious questions regarding the legality of the charge registered against the suit property after the death of the registered owner. Given the nature of the dispute and the reliefs sought, the court determined that the proper forum for hearing and final disposal of the matter is the High Court. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be placed before the Presiding Judge of the High Court at Kitale for hearing and determination. In the interim, the court extended the existing orders of injunction for seven days to preserve the status quo and prevent any sale or alienation of the suit property pending further orders from the court with...

Court Disposition

Application for injunction—interim orders extended; matter transferred for hearing and disposal by the High Court.

Orders

  • The matter is to be placed before the Presiding Judge of the High Court Kitale for hearing and final disposal.
  • The interim orders of injunction previously granted are extended for seven (7) days.