[2020] KEHC 7255 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 7255 (KLR)

The court found no sufficient grounds to intervene in the sentence imposed on the applicants for the offences of performing female genital mutilation and aiding and abetting. Despite the ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) emergency, the court was not satisfied that the case warranted the exercise of its revisionary...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 7255 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samira Leshau; Applicant: Narikuni Leshau; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nanyuki
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 16 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Order on Revision
Outcome
Application for revision dismissed; original sentence upheld.
Legal Topics
Female Genital Mutilation, Sentencing, Revisionary Powers, Aiding and Abetting
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Female Genital Mutilation Sentencing Revisionary Powers Aiding and Abetting

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samira Leshau

Applicant

Narikuni Leshau

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Order on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the court should exercise its revisionary powers to intervene in the sentence imposed for the offence of female genital mutilation and aiding and abetting.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no sufficient grounds to intervene in the sentence imposed on the applicants for the offences of performing female genital mutilation and aiding and abetting. Despite the ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) emergency, the court was not satisfied that the case warranted the exercise of its revisionary jurisdiction under Sections 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The original sentence was therefore left undisturbed.

Court Disposition

Application for revision dismissed; original sentence upheld.

Orders

  • The court declines to intervene in the sentence imposed on the applicants.
  • The application for revision is dismissed.