[2024] KEHC 6526 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6526 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised in this appeal had already been conclusively determined in related appeals (E30/2020 and E31/2020), where the appellant was absolved of liability and the 2nd and 3rd respondents were found liable. Accordingly, the court adopted the reasoning and outcome of those judgments,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6526 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Sammy Traders Limited; Respondent: Nancy Achieng Owino; Respondent: Degitech Enterprises; Respondent: Chardwick Obala
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E29 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Compromise and Costs
Outcome
appeal marked as compromised; appellant absolved of liability; costs to 2nd and 3rd respondents; file closed
Judges
MS Shariff
Legal Topics
Compromise of Appeal, Costs Award, Appellate Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Compromise of Appeal Costs Award Appellate Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sammy Traders Limited

Appellant

Nancy Achieng Owino

Respondent

Degitech Enterprises

Respondent

Chardwick Obala

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Compromise and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be marked as compromised following the determination of related appeals.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised in this appeal had already been conclusively determined in related appeals (E30/2020 and E31/2020), where the appellant was absolved of liability and the 2nd and 3rd respondents were found liable. Accordingly, the court adopted the reasoning and outcome of those judgments, marked the present appeal as compromised, absolved the appellant of liability, and ordered the 2nd and 3rd respondents to bear the costs of the application. The file was ordered closed, as there remained no live issue for determination.

Court Disposition

appeal marked as compromised; appellant absolved of liability; costs to 2nd and 3rd respondents; file closed

Orders

  • The appeal is marked as compromised.
  • The appellant is absolved of any liability.