[2025] KEHC 8098 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 8098 (KLR)

The court found that the trial court erred by relying on authorities that were not comparable to the appellant's injuries, which included a femur fracture and degloving injury. Upon reviewing recent decisions involving similar injuries, the court observed that awards for such injuries ranged from Kshs. 500,000.00 to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 8098 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Brian Munguti Sammy; Respondent: Stanly Wachira Nguya; Respondent: City Star Shuttle Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E1249 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Award of general damages enhanced.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Road Traffic Accidents, Assessment of Damages, Negligence, Apportionment of Liability
Source Language
english
Tort Law Civil Procedure Personal Injury Road Traffic Accidents Assessment of Damages Negligence Apportionment of Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brian Munguti Sammy

Appellant

Stanly Wachira Nguya

Respondent

City Star Shuttle Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial court erred in awarding general damages of Kshs. 400,000.00 for injuries sustained by the appellant.
  2. 2 Whether the authorities relied upon by the trial court were comparable to the appellant's injuries.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate quantum of general damages for a femur fracture and degloving injury.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the trial court erred by relying on authorities that were not comparable to the appellant's injuries, which included a femur fracture and degloving injury. Upon reviewing recent decisions involving similar injuries, the court observed that awards for such injuries ranged from Kshs. 500,000.00 to Kshs. 1,200,000.00. The award of Kshs. 400,000.00 was therefore manifestly low and did not reflect the current judicial trend for comparable injuries. The appellate court exercised its discretion to interfere with the award and substituted it with Kshs. 700,000.00 as general damages, which was consistent with recent precedents and the nature of the injuries sustained by the...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Award of general damages enhanced.

Orders

  • The award of general damages of Kshs. 400,000.00 is set aside and substituted with Kshs. 700,000.00.
  • The appellant shall have the costs of the appeal.