[2017] KEELC 3497 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3497 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant is entitled to enforcement of the orders previously issued on 30.9.2014 and 25.11.2015, as the respondents have not complied and no appeal or setting aside of the orders has occurred. The respondents' continued occupation and subdivision of the land in defiance of the court's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3497 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson K. A. Tim; Respondent: Grace Kimoi Bittok; Respondent: Collins K. Bittok; Respondent: Elvis K. Bittok; Respondent: Nelson O. Odhiambo; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 346 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Enforcement Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Court Orders, Contempt of Court, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Enforcement of Court Orders Contempt of Court Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson K. A. Tim

Applicant

Grace Kimoi Bittok

Respondent

Collins K. Bittok

Respondent

Elvis K. Bittok

Respondent

Nelson O. Odhiambo

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Enforcement Application

  1. 1 Whether the Officer Commanding Eldama Ravine Police Station should be directed to assist in enforcing previous court orders regarding L.R. NO. LEMBUS/TORONGO/790.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents have disobeyed valid court orders relating to the applicant's ownership and possession of the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is entitled to enforcement of the orders previously issued on 30.9.2014 and 25.11.2015, as the respondents have not complied and no appeal or setting aside of the orders has occurred. The respondents' continued occupation and subdivision of the land in defiance of the court's orders, coupled with their failure to respond to the application, justified the granting of the enforcement order. The court exercised its inherent power to ensure its orders are respected and directed the Officer Commanding Eldama Ravine Police Station to assist in enforcement, emphasizing that court orders must be obeyed to uphold the rule of law.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Officer Commanding Eldama Ravine Police Station is directed to assist in the enforcement of the orders dated 30.9.2014 and 25.11.2015 affirming the prior orders of this court.