[2016] KEHC 4476 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 4476 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff did not meet the threshold for the grant of a temporary injunction as set out in Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd. The evidence at this ex parte stage did not establish a sufficient basis for restraining the defendant from dealing with the property or evicting the plaintiff....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 4476 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Samson Mbaabu Nkarichia; Defendant: Sacinta Kinya Gituma
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Originating Summons 37 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Inhibition
Outcome
Plaintiff's application for injunction dismissed; application for inhibition granted.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Injunctions, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Injunctions Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Mbaabu Nkarichia

Plaintiff

Sacinta Kinya Gituma

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Inhibition

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from evicting or interfering with his occupation of the suit land pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether an order of inhibition should be granted to prevent registration of any dealings with the suit property pending determination of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff did not meet the threshold for the grant of a temporary injunction as set out in Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd. The evidence at this ex parte stage did not establish a sufficient basis for restraining the defendant from dealing with the property or evicting the plaintiff. However, to preserve the subject matter of the suit and prevent any dealings that could prejudice the parties' positions, the court granted an order of inhibition against registration of any dealings with the suit property pending determination of the suit. Both parties were directed to comply with pre-trial procedures under Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules within specified...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application for injunction dismissed; application for inhibition granted.

Orders

  • Prayer for temporary injunction is denied and dismissed.
  • Order of inhibition against registration of any dealings with the suit property is granted pending determination of the suit.