[2019] KECA 636 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 636 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal on the basis that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal against severity of sentence, as such matters are questions of fact and not law. Section 361(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly precludes the Court from hearing appeals on matters of fact,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KECA 636 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Samson Muiruri Mbugua; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 291 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal to the Court of Appeal Against Sentence Only
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Judges
DK Musinga, AK Murgor
Legal Topics
Defilement Offence, Imbecile Victim, Jurisdiction on Sentence, Second Appeal Limitations
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Defilement Offence Imbecile Victim Jurisdiction on Sentence Second Appeal Limitations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Muiruri Mbugua

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal to the Court of Appeal Against Sentence Only

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal against sentence only.
  2. 2 Whether severity of sentence is a matter of law or fact for purposes of appellate jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal on the basis that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal against severity of sentence, as such matters are questions of fact and not law. Section 361(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly precludes the Court from hearing appeals on matters of fact, including the severity of sentence, at the second appellate stage. The Court reaffirmed this position by reference to prior case law, holding that the appellant's plea for reduction of sentence could not be entertained. The appeal was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.