[2016] KEELC 261 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 261 (KLR)

The court found that the affidavits of service did not demonstrate proper service upon the 1st defendant. The process server failed to identify the person allegedly served at the 1st defendant's residence, and the individual named in the second affidavit was not a party to the suit. The court concluded that, if any...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 261 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Samson Muthami Ndungu; Defendant: Shadrack Ndiritu Gichuhi; Defendant: The Nanyuki Land Registrar
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 121 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Regarding Service of Process
Outcome
application granted
Judges
L Waithaka
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Affidavit of Service, Setting Aside Service, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Service of Process Affidavit of Service Setting Aside Service Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Muthami Ndungu

Plaintiff

Shadrack Ndiritu Gichuhi

Defendant

The Nanyuki Land Registrar

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application Regarding Service of Process

  1. 1 Whether the affidavits of service sworn on 25th May, 2015 and 7th July, 2015 constituted proper service upon the 1st defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the court should expunge the affidavits of service from the record for being falsely sworn.
  3. 3 Whether the 1st defendant was ever properly served with summons to enter appearance and the amended notice of motion.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the affidavits of service did not demonstrate proper service upon the 1st defendant. The process server failed to identify the person allegedly served at the 1st defendant's residence, and the individual named in the second affidavit was not a party to the suit. The court concluded that, if any service was effected, it was not properly done in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules. Consequently, the court granted the application to expunge the affidavits of service from the record and directed that proper service be effected upon the 1st defendant's counsel within seven days.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Prayer I in the notice of motion dated 28th June, 2016 is granted; the affidavits of service are expunged from the record.
  • The defendant's counsel to be properly served with the summons to enter appearance, plaint, verifying affidavit, amended plaint dated 11th May, 2015, and amended notice of motion dated 2nd June, 2015 within seven days from the date of the ruling.