[2019] KEHC 2547 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2547 (KLR)

The court held that, pursuant to Section 14 of the Criminal Procedure Code, sentences for multiple offences are to run consecutively unless the court directs otherwise. In this case, the court directed that the two-year sentences on counts 2 and 3 are to run concurrently with the 30-year sentence on count 1. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2547 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Ochieng Ogaja; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 13 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Sentencing Principles, Remission of Sentence, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Principles Remission of Sentence Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Ochieng Ogaja

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentences on counts 2 and 3 should run concurrently with the 30-year sentence on count 1.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to remission of sentence under Section 46 of the Prisons Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, pursuant to Section 14 of the Criminal Procedure Code, sentences for multiple offences are to run consecutively unless the court directs otherwise. In this case, the court directed that the two-year sentences on counts 2 and 3 are to run concurrently with the 30-year sentence on count 1. The court further affirmed that remission of sentence is generally available to all convicted criminal prisoners unless specifically excluded by Section 46(3) and (4) of the Prisons Act. The application was therefore allowed, and the sentences on counts 2 and 3 were ordered to run concurrently with the principal sentence.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The sentence of two years on counts 2 and 3 is to run concurrently with the 30 years that the Petitioner has been re-sentenced in count 1.