[2021] KEHC 9476 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9476 (KLR)

The court found that although there was no error in its previous order striking out the appeal for being filed out of time without leave, the failure to annex or cite the order granting leave was a procedural lapse attributable to counsel, not the applicant. Given the criminal nature of the case and the applicant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9476 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Omamo Kodande; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E025 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application to Review Order Striking Out Appeal
Outcome
application allowed; previous order striking out appeal set aside; appeal reinstated
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Review of Court Orders, Right of Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Appeal Out of Time Review of Court Orders Right of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Omamo Kodande

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application to Review Order Striking Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should review and set aside its previous order striking out the appeal for being filed out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to reinstatement of the appeal despite procedural errors by counsel.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although there was no error in its previous order striking out the appeal for being filed out of time without leave, the failure to annex or cite the order granting leave was a procedural lapse attributable to counsel, not the applicant. Given the criminal nature of the case and the applicant's right of appeal, the court exercised its discretion to review and set aside the order striking out the appeal. The appeal was reinstated to allow the applicant to ventilate his grievance, and the applicant was directed to extract and file the ruling/order in the relevant appeal file and serve the Office of Director of Public Prosecutions. The court emphasized the importance of...

Court Disposition

application allowed; previous order striking out appeal set aside; appeal reinstated

Orders

  • The order of 2.7.2019 striking out Criminal Appeal No. 18 of 2019 is set aside.
  • Criminal Appeal No. 18 of 2019 is reinstated for hearing interpartes.