[2001] KECA 82 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 82 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time as the application was unopposed and there was no reason to refuse the request. The applicant was therefore allowed to file the notice of appeal and the record of appeal within the specified extended periods.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 82 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samuel Aloice Kimani; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 36 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Criminal Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extension of Time Criminal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Aloice Kimani

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time as the application was unopposed and there was no reason to refuse the request. The applicant was therefore allowed to file the notice of appeal and the record of appeal within the specified extended periods.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The notice of appeal, if not already filed, be filed within seven days of the date hereof. If already filed, time is extended to the date when it was filed.
  • The record of appeal is to be filed within thirty days from today.