[2019] KEHC 3801 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 3801 (KLR)

The court found that the present appeal was a duplication of HCRA 129/2016, which had already been determined by a judgment allowing the appeal against conviction and sentence. To avoid duplicity and unnecessary use of judicial resources, the court struck out the current appeal and ordered the file closed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 3801 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Samuel Amani Odongo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 124 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Duplicative Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out as duplicative; file closed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Appeal Duplication, Conviction and Sentence, Case Striking Out
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeal Duplication Conviction and Sentence Case Striking Out

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Amani Odongo

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Duplicative Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the present appeal is a duplication of HCRA 129/2016.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be struck out due to duplication.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the present appeal was a duplication of HCRA 129/2016, which had already been determined by a judgment allowing the appeal against conviction and sentence. To avoid duplicity and unnecessary use of judicial resources, the court struck out the current appeal and ordered the file closed.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as duplicative; file closed.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out as a duplication of HCRA 129/2016.
  • The file is hereby closed.