[2019] KEELC 1783 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1783 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had been in continuous, open, and non-permissive occupation of the suit land for over 12 years, as evidenced by their testimony and affidavits. The respondents did not contest the claims or present any evidence to the contrary. The court applied the principle that such occupation...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 1783 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samuel Bartingei; Applicant: Dinah Cheptoo Kenei; Respondent: Kiplagat Chebet; Respondent: Samuel Lagat
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 244 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
suit allowed
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Trusts in Land, Title Extinguishment
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Trusts in Land Title Extinguishment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Bartingei

Applicant

Dinah Cheptoo Kenei

Applicant

Kiplagat Chebet

Respondent

Samuel Lagat

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have acquired title to portions of Tarakwa/Languise/Block 1 (Arusen) 15 by adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent holds the title to portions of the land in trust for the applicants.
  3. 3 Whether the title held by the respondent was extinguished after 12 years of the applicants' possession.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had been in continuous, open, and non-permissive occupation of the suit land for over 12 years, as evidenced by their testimony and affidavits. The respondents did not contest the claims or present any evidence to the contrary. The court applied the principle that such occupation extinguishes the registered owner's title under the Limitation of Actions Act. Consequently, the applicants were entitled to be declared proprietors of the respective portions they occupied, and the respondent's title was held to be extinguished and/or held in trust for the applicants.

Court Disposition

suit allowed

Orders

  • The 1st applicant has acquired title of a portion measuring approximately 5 acres to the said land by adverse possession.
  • The respondent Kiplagat Chebet, his heirs, agents, assigns and/or successors hold the title of a portion measuring 4 acres to the said land in trust for the 1st applicant.