[2021] KEHC 9383 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9383 (KLR)

The applicant demonstrated that he holds a valid judgment and Certificate of Order against the Government, has made a demand for payment, and the respondents have failed to pay the decretal sum. The evidence provided establishes an arguable case fit for further consideration. The threshold for granting leave to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9383 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samuel E.O. Bosire; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: Principal Secretary Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Application for Leave to Commence Judicial Review Proceedings
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for order of mandamus; application certified urgent; directions issued for further conduct of the matter.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Enforcement of Judgments, Government Liability
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Orders Enforcement of Judgments Government Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel E.O. Bosire

Applicant

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Principal Secretary Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Application for Leave to Commence Judicial Review Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established an arguable case to warrant leave to commence judicial review proceedings for an order of mandamus.
  2. 2 Whether the Attorney General and Principal Secretary are under a legal obligation to pay the decretal sum as per the Certificate of Order against the Government.
  3. 3 Whether the requirements for granting leave under Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules have been met.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated that he holds a valid judgment and Certificate of Order against the Government, has made a demand for payment, and the respondents have failed to pay the decretal sum. The evidence provided establishes an arguable case fit for further consideration. The threshold for granting leave to commence judicial review proceedings has therefore been met, as the applicant has shown a prima facie case for an order of mandamus to compel payment by the respondents. The court is satisfied that the application is merited and grants leave accordingly.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for order of mandamus; application certified urgent; directions issued for further conduct of the matter.

Orders

  • The applicant's Chamber Summons dated 14th December 2020 is certified urgent and admitted to hearing ex parte.
  • The applicant is granted leave to apply for an order of mandamus compelling the respondents to pay the decretal sum of Kshs. 836,557 with interest at court rates from 1st June 2011, as per the Certificate of Order against the Government.