[2019] KEELRC 1410 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent as a Dumper Driver and was terminated without notice, valid reason, or adherence to fair procedure. The respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or adduce any evidence to contradict the claimant's case. The court held that the termination...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1410 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Samuel Githinji Mwichigi; Respondent: China Road & Bridge [Kenya] Co. Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 778 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed for the claimant.
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Notice Pay, Compensation for Termination, Certificate of Service
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Githinji Mwichigi
Claimant
China Road & Bridge [Kenya] Co. Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment by the respondent.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to salary for August 2016, notice pay, and compensation for unfair termination.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to a certificate of service, costs, and interest.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent as a Dumper Driver and was terminated without notice, valid reason, or adherence to fair procedure. The respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or adduce any evidence to contradict the claimant's case. The court held that the termination was both procedurally and substantively unfair under the Employment Act. The claimant was entitled to salary for August 2016, one month salary in lieu of notice, and compensation equivalent to four months' salary for unfair termination, but not the twelve months claimed. The court also ordered the issuance of a certificate of service, costs, and interest at 14% per annum from the...
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed for the claimant.
Orders
- It is declared that termination was unfair.
- The respondent shall pay the claimant salary for August 2016 at Kshs. 50,528; notice at Kshs. 50,528; and four months' salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 202,212, totaling Kshs. 303,268.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
43 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR
RELATIONS COURT AT MOMBASA
CAUSE NUMBER 778 OF 2017
BETWEEN
SAMUEL GITHINJI MWICHIGI........................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
CHINA ROAD & BRIDGE [KENYA] CO. LIMITED....RESPONDENT
Rika J
Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe
Mburu Kariuki & Company Advocates for the Claimant
Waithera Ngige & Company Advocates for the Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant filed his Statement of Claim on 4th October 2017. He avers he was employed by the Respondent Company as a Dumper Driver, in August 2015. He worked until 9th September 2016, when he alleges, the Respondent unfairly terminated his contract. His last salary was Kshs. 50,528 monthly. He seeks Judgment against the Respondent in the following terms:-
a) Salary for August 2016 at Kshs. 50,528.
b) 12 months’ salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 606,340.
c) 3 months’ salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 151,525.
Total…Kshs. 808,393
d) Certificate of Service to issue.
e) Costs.
f) Interest.
2. The Respondent did not enter appearance and file its response within the period prescribed by the Employment and Labour Relations Court [Procedure] Rules 2016. The Claim was mentioned in Court on 23rd October 2018, and scheduled to be heard on formal proof on 18th February 2019.
3. There is on record a Notice of Appointment of Advocates, filed on 1st November 2018. On 10th January 2019, a few weeks to the scheduled formal proof hearing, the Respondent filed a Statement of Response.
4. This Statement of Response was filed way beyond the prescribed time, without the leave of the Court, when the matter had already been fixed for formal proof, and was clearly therefore, improperly placed on the record. The Statement of Response filed on 10th January 2019, is expunged from the record.
5. On the 18th February 2019, the Claimant testified on formal proof. He adopted his Witness Statement on record. He relied on list of documents filed on 4th October 2017, which includes pay slip and bank statements.
The Court Finds:-
6. The evidence on record is adequate to establish that the Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a Dumper Driver. He worked from August 2015 to 9th September 2016. His duties entailed ferrying of blocks and building materials from DK 19 Kokotoni, to DK 2 in Port Reitz, Mombasa, for construction of the Standard Gauge Railway. His salary was Kshs. 50,528 monthly.
7. The evidence shows he was undertaking such duty, when he was informed by the Respondent, by word of mouth, that his contract had been terminated. There was no notice. There were no accusations of any employment offence leveled against the Claimant. He was not heard on any allegation. Termination was not based on valid reason or reasons, and did not conform to fair procedure, under Sections 41, 43 and 45 of the Employment Act.
8. There is no evidence adduced by the Respondent to contradict the Claimant on his prayer for August 2016 salary. It is allowed at Kshs. 50,528.
9. The Claimant has not established that he was entitled to 3 months’ salary in lieu of notice. No contract, wage instrument or legal provision has been brought to the attention of the Court, to back up this prayer. He was paid a monthly salary. Under Section 35 and 36 of the Employment Act, he is entitled to 1 month salary in lieu of notice, which the Court grants at Kshs. 50,528.
10. Termination as concluded above was unfair on account of both procedure and substance. The Claimant had worked for period of 1 year. He expected to work to the end of the SGR project. His contract was terminated before the end of the project. He however has no justification to demand for 12 months’ salary in compensation for unfair termination, having worked in total for about the same period of 12 months. He is granted equivalent of 4 months’ salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 202,212.
11. Certificate of Service to issue.
12. Costs to the Claimant.
13. Interest allowed at 14% per annum from the date of Judgment till payment is made in full.
IN SUM, IT IS ORDERED:-
a) It is declared that termination was unfair.
b) The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant: salary for August 2016 at Kshs. 50,528; notice at Kshs. 50,528; and equivalent of 4 months’ salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 202,212- total Kshs. 303,268.
c) Certificate of Service to issue.
d) Costs to the Claimant.
e) Interest allowed at 14% per annum from the date of Judgment till payment is made in full.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 14th day of June 2019.
James Rika
Judge