[2017] KEELC 2557 (KLR)
The court found that both the Land Registrar's Report dated 17/7/2014 and the County Surveyor's Report dated 14/7/2014 confirmed the defendant's encroachment onto the plaintiff's land. The defendant did not attend court to substantiate his defence or challenge the reports. The court held that the plaintiff had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 2557 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Samuel Kiboi Simatwa; Defendant: Peter Mwaniki Njuguna
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Land Case 11 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for eviction allowed; each party to bear its own costs.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Land Encroachment, Eviction, Boundary Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Kiboi Simatwa
Plaintiff
Peter Mwaniki Njuguna
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant encroached upon the plaintiff's land by approximately 8 metres.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order of eviction against the defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both the Land Registrar's Report dated 17/7/2014 and the County Surveyor's Report dated 14/7/2014 confirmed the defendant's encroachment onto the plaintiff's land. The defendant did not attend court to substantiate his defence or challenge the reports. The court held that the plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to the order of eviction sought in the plaint. The decision was based on the uncontroverted expert evidence and the defendant's failure to rebut the plaintiff's claims.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for eviction allowed; each party to bear its own costs.
Orders
- The defendant, his agents, servants, employees and/or anyone claiming under him are ordered to vacate the encroached 8 metres of Plot No. Trans-Nzoia/Zea/377, failing which eviction shall issue.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT KITALE
LAND CASE NO. 11 OF 2015
SAMUEL KIBOI SIMATWA...........................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
PETER MWANIKI NJUGUNA...................................DEFENDANT
J U D G E M E N T
The plaintiff filed this suit on 5/2/2015 seeking the following orders:-
a. An order of eviction of the defendant, his agents, servants, employees and/or anyone claiming under him from the 8 meters or so part of the plaintiffs land Plot No. Trans-Nzoia/Zea/377.
b. Costs of the suit.
c. Any other relief this Honourable Court may deem fit and just to grant.
The plaintiff pleaded that the defendant encroached on his land by about 8 metres, and he has asked him to correct the anomaly in vain. He avers that the Trans-Nzoia Land Registrar, through the help of Surveyor and in the presence of both parties confirmed the encroachment by the defendant, and that the defendant is now a trespasser into the plaintiff’s land and he should be ordered to move out failure to which he should be evicted.
The defendant filed a memorandum of appearance in person on 20/2/2015 and his defence on 9/3/2015. He denied the encroachment and averred that he bought his plot in the year 2003 with the boundaries as they are to date and that he was issued with a title deed in the year 2015. He further avers that the plaintiff bought his plot 6 years later in the year 2009 from one of the defendant’s neighbours and he found the boundaries as they are and none of the neighbours had any pending dispute by then.
In his witness statement the defendant stated that he was present on 4/7/2014 when the Registrar and the Surveyor came to address the disputed boundaries and that the plaintiff land was measured and found to be 5 acres just as the title deed indicates.
However, the Land Registrar’s Report produced in court as an exhibit, which is dated 17/7/2014, confirms the said encroachment complained of by the plaintiff.
The defendant did not attend court to urge the possible merits of his defence. The Report of the County Surveyor dated 14/7/2014 also confirms the said encroachment.
I find that the plaintiff has proved his case on a balance of probabilities. I therefore grant prayer (a) of the plaint dated 30th January, 2015. Each party shall bear its own costs.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kitale on this 3rd day ofApril, 2017.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
In the presence of:
N/A for the plaintiff who knew of the date
N/A for the defendant who never attended the hearing.
MWANGI NJOROGE
JUDGE
3/4/2017