[2008] KEHC 704 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 704 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant filed the appeal 33 days after the ruling, exceeding the statutory 30-day period prescribed by Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The appellant did not seek or obtain leave to file the appeal out of time. The court held that compliance with the statutory timeline is mandatory...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 704 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Samuel Kiongo Ndegwa; Respondent: National Bank of Kenya; Respondent: Francis Wainaina Kariuki; Respondent: Daniel Kariuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 14 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Appeal Timelines, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Dismissal for Lateness
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Timelines Leave to Appeal Out of Time Dismissal for Lateness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Kiongo Ndegwa

Appellant

National Bank of Kenya

Respondent

Francis Wainaina Kariuki

Respondent

Daniel Kariuki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory period prescribed by Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant sought and obtained leave to file the appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant filed the appeal 33 days after the ruling, exceeding the statutory 30-day period prescribed by Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The appellant did not seek or obtain leave to file the appeal out of time. The court held that compliance with the statutory timeline is mandatory unless leave is granted for late filing. Since the appellant failed to comply with the statutory requirements and did not provide any sufficient cause or obtain leave, the appeal was incompetent and was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appellant’s appeal is dismissed with costs to all the respondents.