[2007] KECA 202 (KLR)

[2007] KECA 202 (KLR)

The Court held that since the appellant, Samuel Kiragu Mwangi, is deceased, the appeal cannot proceed and must abate in accordance with rule 68(1)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The abatement of the appeal is a procedural consequence mandated by the rules when an appellant dies before the determination of the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KECA 202 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Samuel Kiragu Mwangi; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 125 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Abated Due to Death
Outcome
appeal abated
Legal Topics
Appeal Abatement, Death of Appellant
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeal Abatement Death of Appellant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Kiragu Mwangi

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Abated Due to Death

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should proceed in light of the appellant's death.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that since the appellant, Samuel Kiragu Mwangi, is deceased, the appeal cannot proceed and must abate in accordance with rule 68(1)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The abatement of the appeal is a procedural consequence mandated by the rules when an appellant dies before the determination of the appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal abated

Orders

  • The appeal abates under rule 68(1)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules.