[2019] KEHC 5212 (KLR)
The court found that, in light of Article 159 of the Constitution which encourages alternative dispute resolution, and considering the protracted nature of the dispute, it is appropriate to refer the matter to court annexed mediation. The court also considered the defendant's preliminary objection regarding the jurisdiction of the Energy Regulatory Commission but determined that mediation would be a more efficient and cost-effective mechanism for resolving the dispute at this stage. Consequently, the court stayed the proceedings and directed that the matter be mentioned before the Mediation Registrar for appointment of an accredited mediator, with a timeline of 60 days for mediation and a...
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 5212 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Samuel Mbora Gitonga (Suing as administrator of the estate of Mburu Gachagua also known as Mbora Gachagua); Defendant: Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2019
- Case Number
- Civil Case 122 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Referral to Mediation and Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Suit stayed and referred to court annexed mediation.
- Judges
- JK Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Electricity Supply Disputes, Court Annexed Mediation, Preliminary Objection, Jurisdiction of Regulatory Commissions, Damages for Loss of Income, Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Mbora Gitonga (Suing as administrator of the estate of Mburu Gachagua also known as Mbora Gachagua)
Plaintiff
Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Referral to Mediation and Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dispute should be referred to court annexed mediation instead of proceeding to full trial.
- 2 Whether the Energy Regulatory Commission has jurisdiction over the dispute under Section 61(3) of the Energy Act No. 12 of 2006.
- 3 Whether the court should stay proceedings pending mediation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, in light of Article 159 of the Constitution which encourages alternative dispute resolution, and considering the protracted nature of the dispute, it is appropriate to refer the matter to court annexed mediation. The court also considered the defendant's preliminary objection regarding the jurisdiction of the Energy Regulatory Commission but determined that mediation would be a more efficient and cost-effective mechanism for resolving the dispute at this stage. Consequently, the court stayed the proceedings and directed that the matter be mentioned before the Mediation Registrar for appointment of an accredited mediator, with a timeline of 60 days for mediation and a...
Court Disposition
Suit stayed and referred to court annexed mediation.
Orders
- The matter is referred to court annexed mediation before the Mediation Registrar.
- An accredited mediator shall be appointed to guide the parties through mediation within 60 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment