[2021] KEHC 12594 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiffs, as beneficiaries of the deceased shareholders’ estates, are entitled by operation of law to apply for relief as members under section 238(6)(b) of the Companies Act. However, the acts complained of—primarily the borrowing and management decisions—are matters within the company’s management and are capable of being ratified by the company’s majority shareholders. The court emphasized that the majority shareholders, who constitute a significant portion of the company, have not been given an opportunity to consider or ratify the transactions in question. The plaintiffs did not demonstrate that they attempted to requisition a meeting or otherwise seek...
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 12594 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Samuel Mburu Gitere; Plaintiff: Anne Wanjiru Gitere; Defendant: Kenneth Kimari Gitere; Defendant: David Wakangu Gitere; Defendant: National Bank of Kenya; Defendant: Chabrin Agencies Limited; Defendant: Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited; Defendant: Lucas Waithaka Gitere
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2021
- Case Number
- Civil Case 119 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Proceed as Derivative Suit
- Outcome
- Application for leave to proceed as a derivative suit dismissed; suit struck out with costs to the defendants.
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Actions, Company Management, Shareholder Rights, Ratification of Directors Acts
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Mburu Gitere
Plaintiff
Anne Wanjiru Gitere
Plaintiff
Kenneth Kimari Gitere
Defendant
David Wakangu Gitere
Defendant
National Bank of Kenya
Defendant
Chabrin Agencies Limited
Defendant
Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited
Defendant
Lucas Waithaka Gitere
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Proceed as Derivative Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs should be granted permission to proceed with the suit as a derivative action under section 238 of the Companies Act.
- 2 Whether the acts complained of by the plaintiffs are capable of being ratified by the company and its majority shareholders.
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs have standing to bring a derivative action as beneficiaries of shares transmitted by operation of law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiffs, as beneficiaries of the deceased shareholders’ estates, are entitled by operation of law to apply for relief as members under section 238(6)(b) of the Companies Act. However, the acts complained of—primarily the borrowing and management decisions—are matters within the company’s management and are capable of being ratified by the company’s majority shareholders. The court emphasized that the majority shareholders, who constitute a significant portion of the company, have not been given an opportunity to consider or ratify the transactions in question. The plaintiffs did not demonstrate that they attempted to requisition a meeting or otherwise seek...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to proceed as a derivative suit dismissed; suit struck out with costs to the defendants.
Orders
- The Amended Notice of Motion dated 11th June 2018 is dismissed.
- The suit is struck out with costs to the defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment