[2018] KEELC 3823 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3823 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff had established ownership of plot number 5-030 through documentary evidence, specifically the membership card from Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society. The Defendant did not dispute the Plaintiff's ownership but claimed to be using a different plot. The Defendant failed to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3823 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Samuel Muindi; Defendant: Muteti Nthuli
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 86 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaint allowed in part; permanent injunction granted; boundary demarcation ordered; costs to Plaintiff.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Trespass to Land, Boundary Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctions Trespass to Land Boundary Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Muindi

Plaintiff

Muteti Nthuli

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is the lawful allottee and owner of plot number 5-030 at Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant unlawfully entered, removed beacons, and cultivated the Plaintiff's land.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from interfering with plot number 5-030.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff had established ownership of plot number 5-030 through documentary evidence, specifically the membership card from Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society. The Defendant did not dispute the Plaintiff's ownership but claimed to be using a different plot. The Defendant failed to attend the hearing or provide evidence to support his assertions. The court held that the Plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from interfering with plot number 5-030. However, the Plaintiff was not awarded damages for trespass or destruction of trees because he did not specifically plead for such damages or provide evidence, such as expert...

Court Disposition

Plaint allowed in part; permanent injunction granted; boundary demarcation ordered; costs to Plaintiff.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction is issued restraining the Defendant, his servants, and agents from entering or dealing in any way with plot number 5-030 at Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society.
  • The County Surveyor together with officials of Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society shall determine the boundaries of Plot No. 5-030 and neighbouring plots within thirty days from the date of judgment.