[2004] KEHC 1597 (KLR)
The court found that liability for the accident was agreed at 80% against the defendant and 20% against the plaintiff. The plaintiff proved his claims for general damages for pain and suffering, special damages, material loss, and future medical costs, all of which were either agreed or supported by evidence. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 1597 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Samuel Mungai Njau; Defendant: Wanainchi Sanitary & Hardware Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 870 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff, subject to 20% contributory negligence
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Motor Vehicle Accident, Apportionment of Liability, Quantum of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Mungai Njau
Plaintiff
Wanainchi Sanitary & Hardware Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is liable for the injuries and material loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the motor vehicle collision.
- 2 What is the appropriate apportionment of liability between the plaintiff and defendant.
- 3 What is the quantum of damages (general, special, material loss, future medical costs) to be awarded to the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that liability for the accident was agreed at 80% against the defendant and 20% against the plaintiff. The plaintiff proved his claims for general damages for pain and suffering, special damages, material loss, and future medical costs, all of which were either agreed or supported by evidence. The claim for medical expenses was dismissed for lack of proof. The total award was calculated, and 20% was deducted to reflect the plaintiff's share of liability. The court awarded the plaintiff Ksh.336,240, plus costs and interest as specified. The court emphasized the importance of proof for special damages and the binding nature of agreed liability apportionment.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff, subject to 20% contributory negligence
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded Ksh.336,240 as damages after apportionment.
- Plaintiff awarded costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
104 paragraphs
1) Running Down Cause (personal injury; material damage loss
2) Motor vehicle collision between two vehicles
3) Male adult driver aged 31 years old in 2002
4) Injuries:
a) Crushed right leg compound fracture to the right tibia and fibula
b) Fracture of the 1st ,2nd 3rd and 4th Martatarsal of the right foot
c) Superficial wounds over right arm.
5) Liability: (agreed)
1) General Damages
20%:against the plaintiff
80% against the defendant
6) Quantum:-
1) Special Damages
(Agreed)
a) Pain and suffering Ksh.150,000/-
b) Search motor vehicle Ksh. 200/-
II) Material Loss claim
Pre accident value Ksh.150,000/-
Less salvage Ksh. 30,000/-
(Agreed) Ksh.120,000/- Ksh120,000/-
III) Future Medical Costs Ksh.150,000/-
IV Medical expenses not proved Ksh.556,240/-
V) Special damage claims abandoned
a) Assessors fee Ksh. 2,500/-
b) Medical report Ksh. 1,200/-
c) Certified copies of
Traffic proceeding Ksh. 250/-
Total Ksh.420,300/-
Less 20% Ksh.334,240/-
7) Case Law:- Nil
8) Advocates:-
D.N. Malobe Advocate for the plaintiff
T.O. Okundi Advocate for the defendant
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE NO. 870 OF 2002
SAMUEL MUNGAI NJAU …………………………………. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
WANAINCHI SANITARY & HARDWARE LTD …... DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Together with his wife and children, Samuel Mungai Njau was driving his motor vehicle Reg. No.155266 along the Kabete road, when a motor vehicle Reg. Number KAG 7592 owned by the defendant company and driven by their servant and or agent left its lane and came towards the plaintiffs vehicle. The time was 12. 30 a.m. on the 3. 2.02. The vehicle had a collision. The plaintiff lost consciousness and was rushed to the M.P. Shah hospital.
He sued the defendants for damages under the personal injury claim of tort and under the material damage claim for the damaged sustained to his vehicle.
The defendant entered appearance and filed defence. On the day fixed for hearing the parties agreed on liability.
I: LIABILITY
Judgment was duly entered on liability at 20% against the plaintiff and 80% against the defendant.
II: QUANTUM
i) The General Damages
a) Pain and suffering
As a result of the accident the plaintiff sustained injuries.
He was examined by:-
Dr. Modi M.Y.
M.B.B.S. M.S Orthopaedics Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon Date of report 25. 3.02 Injuries:
“Crushed right leg with compound fracture right tibia-fibula.
Wound over right leg was extensive with exposed broken bone and crushed muscles with skin loss.
Viability of leg and foot was doubtful. The wound was oozing blood.
Fracture of 1st,2nd 3rd and 4th metatarsal of right foot with swollen foot Superficial multiple wounds over right arm” The doctor confirmed that the plaintiff sustained the said injuries. The leg would have been amputated but they managed to save it. Dr. M.V. Shah, Consultant treated an infection of the chest. The plaintiff was readmitted to hospital on 21. 2.02. Both advocates did not refer to me any case law.
The injuries sustained is a fracture to the right tibula and fibula. The plaintiff is most fortunate to have his leg in tact. He was able to walk to court albeit with a limb and help of a crutchet. I would assess the damages under the head of pain and suffering at Ksh.150,000/- as being fair in the circumstances.
ii) Special Damages
(agreed)
The parties agreed to the following special damages. a) Police abstract fee Ksh.100/- b) Search for motor vehicle certificate Ksh.200/- Total Ksh.300/- This is subject to apportionment. iii) Material loss claim The plaintiff made a claim for material loss and damage to his motor vehicle. The pre-accident value being Ksh.150,000/- Less salvage Ksh. 30,000/- Total Ksh.120,000/-
The parties agreed to this sum. I accordingly enter for the plaintiff, judgment subject to apportionment. iv) Future medical costs
This was agreed at Ksh.150,000/-
v) Medical expenses Ksh.556,240/-
The plaintiff was unable to prove this claim. This was due to technicalities which objection I uphold. This claim is hereby dismissed.
v) Special damages claims that have been abandoned
a) Assessors fee Ksh. 2,500/-
b) Medical report Ksh.1,200/-
Certified copies of traffic
Court proceeding Ksh.3,950/-
The same stands dismissed.
I accordingly enter judgment for the plaitnfif on the proved claim. In Summary
1) Personal injury claim and material loss claim
2) Male adult driver aged 31 years old in 2002
3) Injuries:
a) Crushed leg, compound fracture of the right tibia and fibula
b) Fracture of 1st, 2nd,3rd and 4th metatarsal of right foot.
c) Superficial wounds over right arm.
4) Liability:- (agreed).
20% against the plaintiff
80% against the defendant
5) Quantum:
1) General Damages
a) Pain and suffering Ksh.150,000/-
II) Special Damages (agreed)
a) Police abstract fee Ksh.100/-
b) Search motor vehicle Ksh.200/-
III) Material Loss Claim
Pre-accident value Ksh.150,000/-
Less salvage Ksh. 30,000/-
(agreed) Ksh.120,000/-
IV) Future medical costs Ksh.150,000/- (agreed)
IV) Medical expenses
(Not proved dismissed) Ksh.556,240/-
Total Ksh.420,300/-
Less 20% Ksh. 84,060/-
Total Ksh.336,240/-
I award the cost of this suit to the plaintiff.
I award interest on General Damages from the date of this
judgment. Interest on Special Damages from the date of filing suit.
Dated this 27th day of May 2004 at Nairobi.
M.A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE
J.K. Mbaabu & Co. Advocates for the plaintiff
Okundi & Co. Advocaes for the defendant