[2008] KEHC 2450 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2450 (KLR)

The court held that the Plaintiff's application was misconceived and incompetent because the only lawful procedure to challenge taxation of bills of costs is by reference under paragraph 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. The Plaintiff's use of a chamber summons was not permitted, and the court therefore...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 2450 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Samuel Muthia Mague; Defendant: American Life Insurance Company (K) Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 252 of 1991
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Execution Proceedings
Outcome
Application struck out for incompetence; costs awarded to Defendant; interim orders vacated.
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Service of Process, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Service of Process Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Muthia Mague

Plaintiff

American Life Insurance Company (K) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Execution Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff can challenge the orders of taxation and subsequent execution proceedings by chamber summons instead of by reference under paragraph 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain the Plaintiff's application given the procedure used.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Plaintiff's application was misconceived and incompetent because the only lawful procedure to challenge taxation of bills of costs is by reference under paragraph 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. The Plaintiff's use of a chamber summons was not permitted, and the court therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application. The Advocates (Remuneration) Order constitutes a complete code for taxation matters, excluding the application of ordinary civil procedure rules. Consequently, the application was struck out with costs to the Defendant, and any interim orders previously granted were vacated.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for incompetence; costs awarded to Defendant; interim orders vacated.

Orders

  • The Plaintiff's application by chamber summons dated 17th October, 2007 is struck out with costs to the Defendant.
  • Any interim orders granted are hereby vacated.