[2010] KEHC 2803 (KLR)
The court found that the complainant, a police officer, sustained soft tissue injuries as reflected in the P3 form and corroborated by physical evidence (soiled blouse). The appellant's claim of being assaulted was unsupported by any formal complaint or medical evidence. The trial magistrate properly evaluated the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2803 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Samuel Mwangi Kinyua; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 69 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction upheld, sentence varied
- Judges
- J Karanja
- Legal Topics
- Assault in Resisting Arrest, Sentencing Principles, Police Powers, Criminal Procedure, Appeals Against Conviction, Evidence Evaluation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Mwangi Kinyua
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant assaulted a police officer while resisting arrest contrary to Section 253(a) of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate was biased or erred in evaluating the evidence.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was proper and lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the complainant, a police officer, sustained soft tissue injuries as reflected in the P3 form and corroborated by physical evidence (soiled blouse). The appellant's claim of being assaulted was unsupported by any formal complaint or medical evidence. The trial magistrate properly evaluated the evidence and was not biased. The conviction for assault in resisting arrest was upheld as the evidence established the offence beyond reasonable doubt. However, given the passage of time since the original sentence and the few months of imprisonment remaining, the appellate court substituted the custodial sentence with a fine of Ksh. 3,000, in default three months imprisonment,...
Court Disposition
conviction upheld, sentence varied
Orders
- The appeal against conviction is dismissed.
- The custodial sentence is set aside and substituted with a fine of Ksh. 3,000, in default three months imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
Criminal Appeal 69 of 2006
SAMUEL MWANGI KINYUA……….......………………………………APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………………………………………RESPONDENT
J U D G M EN T
On 9/5/2005 at about 3. 50 p.m, the appellant herein was driving motor vehicle Registration No. KTT 541 a Datsun 1200 pick-up along the Kerugoya –Kutus Road.P.C Grace Wanjiru and other colleagues were on Traffic duties along the said road.They stopped the appellant’s motor vehicle and upon inspecting it, he was found with a few faults for which he was to be escorted to the police station for booking.The complainant boarded the motor vehicle to escort it to the police station. Somewhere in town before they reached the police station, the appellant stopped his motor vehicle and said he would not drive to the police station.The complainant attempted to take the ignition keys but the appellant is said to have kicked her on her chest, shoulder and on her leg before she managed to open the passenger door and alight.The appellant is said to have escaped from the scene.
The complainant went to the police station and reported the matter.She was issued with a P3 form produced as exhibit by PW3. The complainant had suffered soft tissue injuries to her chest, right upper arm and her right knee.The degree of injury was assessed as harm.
The appellant was later arrested and charged with the offence of Assault in resisting Arrest contrary to Section 253 (a) of the penal code.
According to the appellant however, it was the complainant who hit him and so he refused to drive the car to the police station.
The magistrate after hearing this evidence found the appellant guilty of the offence, convicted him and sentenced him to 12 months imprisonment.
Being aggrieved by that conviction and sentence, he filed this appeal.His appeal is against the conviction and sentence.On the sentence he says he ought to have been given the option of a fine.He also contends that section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code was not complied with but the record clearly shows that the same was complied with.The other grounds were that the charges were fabricated by the police and that the magistrate was biased for having heard the traffic offences emanating from the same incident.
I have re-evaluated the evidence adduced before the trial court along with the said grounds of Appeal.I find like the learned trial magistrate did that indeed the complainant had sustained the injuries as reflected in the P3 form.Although the appellant claimed to have been injured, he never made a formal complaint or sought treatment in hospital.From the record, the complainant even produced her soiled blouse to show that the appellant had stepped on her. The appellant’s assertion that it was the complainant who had grabbed his leg cannot be true because she could not have imprinted the appellants foot on her blouse.
I am satisfied that the appellant did indeed assault the police officer while resisting arrest.The magistrate decided the case on the evidence on record and there is nothing to show that he was biased.I have no basis or reason to interfere with the Judgment of the learned trial magistrate.The same was properly arrived at.Accordingly, the appeal on conviction therefore fails.On the sentence, the same was proper and lawful but in my view it will not serve the ends of justice to send the appellant back to prison 4 years down the line for him to serve the few months left.I will therefore interfere with the same and set it aside and substitute thereof a fine of Ksh.3,000 (three thousand) in default to serve 3 months imprisonment.
W. KARANJA
JUDGE
Delivered, dated and signed at Embu this 6th day of May 2010
In presence of:-Appellant, Mr. Ngigi for Mr Gitonga for him and Ms Matiru for the state.
W. KARANJA
JUDGE
6/5/2010