[2022] KEHC 27043 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner’s request to withdraw the interlocutory application was merited, as there was no objection from the respondents and withdrawal would facilitate the expeditious hearing of the main petition. The court exercised its discretion under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 27043 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Samuel O. Nyauke; Respondent: The Homa Bay Sub-County Administrator; Respondent: Officer Commanding Police Division-Homa-Bay; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: Ernest Bin Amito; Respondent: Joint Base Nava Enterprises Limited; Respondent: The Director General National Environment Management Authority (NEMA)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition E001 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Withdrawal of Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- interlocutory application withdrawn; petition to proceed by written submissions
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Applications, Withdrawal of Application, Written Submissions, Environmental Nuisance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel O. Nyauke
Applicant
The Homa Bay Sub-County Administrator
Respondent
Officer Commanding Police Division-Homa-Bay
Respondent
Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
Ernest Bin Amito
Respondent
Joint Base Nava Enterprises Limited
Respondent
The Director General National Environment Management Authority (NEMA)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Withdrawal of Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner should be allowed to withdraw the interlocutory application dated 10th February 2022.
- 2 Whether the petition should proceed by way of written submissions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner’s request to withdraw the interlocutory application was merited, as there was no objection from the respondents and withdrawal would facilitate the expeditious hearing of the main petition. The court exercised its discretion under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, and marked the application as withdrawn, with costs in the cause. The court further directed that the petition be heard by way of written submissions, setting timelines for the parties to file and serve their submissions, in line with the overriding objective of efficient and fair administration of justice as enshrined in Article 159(2) of the Constitution and Section 3 of...
Court Disposition
interlocutory application withdrawn; petition to proceed by written submissions
Orders
- The petitioner’s application dated 10th February 2022 is marked as withdrawn.
- Costs of the withdrawn application to be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT HOMABAY
ELC CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO E001 OF 2022
SAMUEL O. NYAUKE.................................................................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE HOMABAY SUB-COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR...................................1ST RESPONDENT
OFFICER COMANDING POLICE DIVISION-HOMA-BAY......................2ND RESPONDENT
HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL........................................................................3RD RESPONDENT
ERNEST BIN AMITO.......................................................................................4TH RESPONDENT
JOINT BASE NAVA ENTERPRISES LIMITED..........................................5TH RESPONDENT
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL NATIONAL
ENVIRONEMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (NEMA)..................6TH RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Petitioner’s application by way of Notice of Motion dated 10th February 2022 and duly filed herein on 15th February 2022 is for inter-partes hearing today. The same is seeking orders, inter, alia, hearing of the application at the site of the nuisance, namely LR No. Kayada/Kotieno Katuma “A”/2991 and interim orders in quo suspending any form of music as to be played by the 5th Respondent thereon.
2. The 5th respondent through M/s Oluoch Amma and Co. Advocates opposed the application by grounds of opposition dated 17th February 2022 and the supporting affidavit annexed thereto.
3. The Petitioner has sought to withdraw the application to pave way for the hearing of the Petition by way of written submissions.
4. Mr. Oluoch Ammon, learned counsel for the 5th respondent and Mr. Robert Ochieng learned counsel for the 4th respondent and holding brief for Mr. Joseph Maina, learned counsel for the 6th respondent, have no objection to the Petitioner’s prayer.
5. In the premises, I find the Petitioner’s prayer merited.
6. Thus, pursuant to Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil procedure Rules, 2010,the petitioner’s application dated 10th February 2022 and duly filed in this court on 15th February 2022 , is hereby marked as withdrawn. Costs be in the cause.
7. I applaud the petitioner, learned Counsel for the 4th, 5th and 6th Respondents for having facilitated prompt and fair determination of the application in consonant with Article 159 (2) (b) and (c) of the Constitution of Kenya,2010 and section 3 of the Environment Land Court Act, 2015 (2011).
8. It is further ordered and directed that this Petition dated 2nd February 2022 and filed in court on 3rd February 2022, be heard by way of written submissions.
9. The Petitioner’s submissions dated 2nd February 2022 and filed herein on 2nd February 2022, hereby deemed duly filed and served on the 4th, 5th and 6th respondents. The same be served on the other respondents before the close of business today.
10. The respondents to file and serve their submissions within seven (7) days from this date.
11. The petitioner to file further or supplementary submissions, if any, within two (2) days from the date of service of the respondents’ submissions.
12. The Petition is fixed for 2nd March 2022 for purposes of submissions and for directions.
13. It is so ordered.
G.M.A ONG’ONDO
JUDGE
Present
1. Mr. Ammon Oluoch, learned counsel for the 5th respondent.
2. Mr. Nyauke, learned counsel, the petitioner
3. Mr. Robert Ochieng learned counsel for the 4th respondent as well as holding brief for learned counsel Mr. Joseph Maina for the 6th respondent.
4. Okello, court assistant.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT HOMA BAY THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022.
G.M.A ONG’ONDO
JUDGE