[2009] KEHC 425 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had complied with all bail conditions in the lower court and had not absconded. Upon reviewing the Memorandum of Appeal, the court was satisfied that the appeal raised substantial points of law, and that the applicant had already served a significant portion of his sentence....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 425 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Samuel Tsuma Jilani; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 71 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Conviction and Sentence, Making Document Without Authority, Stealing, Appeal Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Tsuma Jilani
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be admitted to bail pending the hearing and determination of his criminal appeal.
- 2 Whether the conditions for granting bail pending appeal as set out in precedent have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had complied with all bail conditions in the lower court and had not absconded. Upon reviewing the Memorandum of Appeal, the court was satisfied that the appeal raised substantial points of law, and that the applicant had already served a significant portion of his sentence. Applying the principles set out in Jivraj Shah v Republic, the court concluded that the conditions for granting bail pending appeal were met. Accordingly, the applicant was admitted to bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal, subject to the provision of a bond and surety as specified.
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
Orders
- The applicant is admitted to bail pending appeal.
- The applicant may be released on a bond of Kshs. 200,000 plus one surety of a like sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
Criminal Appeal 71 of 2009
SAMUEL TSUMA JILANI ………..…….……………….. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ……………………………..…………………… RESPONDENT
**********************
RULING
The Applicant herein has filed this Notice of Motion dated 20th July 2009 seeking to be admitted to bail/bond during the pendency of his appeal. The Applicant herein was the 2nd accused person in the matter of Republic –vs- Swaleh Juma Mwalewa and Samuel Tsuma Jilani Criminal Case No. 50 of 2007 which was heard and determined by the Senior Resident Magistrate, Kaloleni. In that case the two accused had been jointly charged on a first count of Making a Document without Authority contrary to Section 357(a) of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya. They both faced a second count of Stealing contrary to 275 of the Penal Code. At the conclusion of the trial the learned Senior Resident Magistrate did on 4th May 2009 convict both accused persons. They were sentenced to serve a prison term of four (4) years on each count, sentences are to run concurrently. The Applicant being dissatisfied with the decision of the lower court did file a Memorandum of Appeal on 15th May 2009. He did also file this present application seeking to be admitted to bail pending the hearing of said appeal.
Mr. Ouma Advocate appeared for the Applicant and argued in favour of the application. Mr. Onserio, State Counsel appeared for the Respondent State and opposed the application.
I have carefully considered the submissions of Mr. Ouma in support of this present application as well as the submissions of Mr. Onserio in opposition thereof. I have also carefully considered the cited authority of Jivraj Shah –vs- Republic [1986] KLR 605 where it was held that:-
“2 If it appears prima facie from the totality of the circumstances that the appeal is likely to be successful on account of some substantial point of law to be urged and that the sentence or substantial part of it will have been served by the time the appeal is heard, conditions for granting bail will exist.”
I note that the Applicant was admitted to bail in the lower court and I further note that at no time did he fail to attend court as required. I further take cognizance of the fact that the Applicant has to date served about six (6) months of his sentence. Although the appeal has not yet been admitted to hearing I have perused the Memorandum of Appeal and I am convinced that the conditions laid down by the Court of Appeal in the Jivraj Shah case have been satisfied. As such I do hereby allow this present application and I do admit the Applicant to bail pending appeal. The Applicant may be released on a bond of Kshs.200,000/- + 1 surety of a like sum. Bond to be approved by the Deputy Registrar of the High Court.
Dated and Delivered at Mombasa this 4th day of December 2009.
M. ODERO
JUDGE
Read in open court in the presence of:
Mr. Ouma for Appellant
Mr. Monda for State
M. ODERO
JUDGE
4/12/2009