[2018] KEHC 7029 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 7029 (KLR)

The court found that the Notice to Show Cause for dismissal for want of prosecution was issued prematurely and set it aside. The court further held that the proper procedure is to determine the preliminary objection dated 29th November 2017 before considering the substantive application dated 23rd October 2017....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 7029 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samwel Kamau Mwaura & Others; Applicant: Peter Kamau Wagaiyu; Applicant: Michael Waweru Kirubi; Applicant: Malewa Ranching Co. Ltd; Respondent: Stanley Nganaga Kariuki; Respondent: Peter Njuguna Njoroge; Respondent: Stephen Tibi Njenga; Respondent: Joseph Nyutu Nganga; Respondent: Joseph Kamau Kimani; Respondent: Samwel Kimani Kariuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyahururu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 30 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Directions
Outcome
Preliminary objection to be heard first; Notice to Show Cause set aside; directions issued for submissions.
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Transfer of Suit, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Written Submissions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Preliminary Objection Transfer of Suit Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Written Submissions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samwel Kamau Mwaura & Others

Applicant

Peter Kamau Wagaiyu

Applicant

Michael Waweru Kirubi

Applicant

Malewa Ranching Co. Ltd

Applicant

Stanley Nganaga Kariuki

Respondent

Peter Njuguna Njoroge

Respondent

Stephen Tibi Njenga

Respondent

Joseph Nyutu Nganga

Respondent

Joseph Kamau Kimani

Respondent

Samwel Kimani Kariuki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 23rd October 2017 should be struck out on the basis of the preliminary objection.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice to Show Cause for dismissal for want of prosecution was properly issued.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Notice to Show Cause for dismissal for want of prosecution was issued prematurely and set it aside. The court further held that the proper procedure is to determine the preliminary objection dated 29th November 2017 before considering the substantive application dated 23rd October 2017. Directions were issued for parties to file and serve written submissions on the preliminary objection within specified timelines, with the matter to be mentioned for further directions.

Court Disposition

Preliminary objection to be heard first; Notice to Show Cause set aside; directions issued for submissions.

Orders

  • The Notice to Show Cause dated 14th December 2016 is set aside.
  • The preliminary objection dated 29th November 2017 shall be heard and determined before the substantive application.