[1999] KECA 20 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 20 (KLR)

The court found that although the delay between the striking out of the previous appeal and the filing of the present application was lengthy, the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay by showing that he was unaware of the striking out until he checked at the registry. Upon learning of the event, he acted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] KECA 20 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samwel Ndura Kanyara; Respondent: Mary Njambi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 88 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Struck Out, Delay Explanation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Struck Out Delay Explanation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samwel Ndura Kanyara

Applicant

Mary Njambi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the notice and record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the delay from 23rd September, 1996 to 20th March, 1997 is inordinate and if it should be excused.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the delay between the striking out of the previous appeal and the filing of the present application was lengthy, the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay by showing that he was unaware of the striking out until he checked at the registry. Upon learning of the event, he acted promptly. The absence of these facts in the affidavits was not, in the court's view, a sufficient reason to reject the explanation, particularly since the applicant was not present when the appeal was struck out. The court therefore exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant shall file and serve his notice of appeal within seven days of the date hereof.
  • The applicant must file his record of appeal within twenty-one days from the date of filing the notice of appeal.