[2017] KEELC 189 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 189 (KLR)

The court found that the Defendant/Applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the extension of the suspension of the permanent injunction, as the delay in obtaining proceedings for the appeal was not due to their fault. The court accepted that the Applicant, being a religious organization, would suffer...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 189 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Samwel Orwa Wayuga; Defendant: The Church Commissioners of Kenya of the Anglican Church of Kenya
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 56 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Stay and Extension of Suspension of Permanent Injunction Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for extension of suspension of permanent injunction granted.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Permanent Injunction, Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Irreparable Harm
Source Language
en
Land and Property Permanent Injunction Stay of Execution Appeal Procedure Irreparable Harm

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samwel Orwa Wayuga

Plaintiff

The Church Commissioners of Kenya of the Anglican Church of Kenya

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Stay and Extension of Suspension of Permanent Injunction Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant a stay of execution of the judgment and decree, specifically the permanent injunction, pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the period of suspension of the permanent injunction should be extended due to delays in obtaining proceedings for appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Defendant/Applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the extension of the suspension of the permanent injunction, as the delay in obtaining proceedings for the appeal was not due to their fault. The court accepted that the Applicant, being a religious organization, would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction was enforced before the appeal was heard. The absence of the Plaintiff/Respondent's counsel, despite proper service, left the application unopposed. Applying the principles in Giella v Cassman Brown, the court exercised its discretion to extend the suspension of the permanent injunction for sixty days to allow the Defendant/Applicant to pursue the...

Court Disposition

Application for extension of suspension of permanent injunction granted.

Orders

  • The period of suspension of the permanent injunction and/or stay of the same pursuant to the judgment delivered on 27/6/2016 is extended for sixty (60) days from the date of this ruling.
  • Certified copies of proceedings to be supplied to the Defendant/Applicant’s counsel urgently.