[2008] KEHC 3019 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant was found in possession of four animals that had been stolen from the complainant. The appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation as to how he came into possession of the animals. The evidence of the prosecution witnesses was corroborated and the trial court was correct...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 3019 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Sando Swagi Marwa; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 152 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stealing Stock, Possession of Stolen Property, Burden of Proof, Criminal Sentencing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sando Swagi Marwa
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence adduced was sufficient to sustain a conviction for stealing stock.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant was found in possession of four animals that had been stolen from the complainant. The appellant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation as to how he came into possession of the animals. The evidence of the prosecution witnesses was corroborated and the trial court was correct in finding that the animals belonged to the complainant. The doctrine of recent possession applied, and the conviction was proper. The sentence of five years' imprisonment was not harsh or excessive given the circumstances. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed in its entirety.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
OF KISII
Criminal Appeal 152 of 2007
SANDO SWAGI MARWA …………………………….. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ……………………..……………………RESPONDENT
(From original conviction and sentence of the ResidentMagistrate’s Court at Kehancha,
Criminal Case No.263of 2006 by M. K. K. SEREM ESQ., RM)
JUDGMENT
The appellant was charged with stealing stock contrary to section 278 of Penal Code. He was convicted and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He was aggrieved by the conviction and sentence and preferred an appeal to this court. In his petition of appeal he stated that there was no sufficient evidence to warrant his conviction. He further stated that the sentence that was passed was harsh and excessive.
During the hearing of the appeal, the appellant opted not make any oral submissions.
Mr. Kemo, Principal State Counsel, opposed the appeal. He submitted that there was overwhelming evidence that the appellant indeed committed the said offence.
This being the first appellate court, it is mandated to examine a fresh the evidence that was adduced before the trial court, re-evaluate the same reach its own conclusion, see OKENO VS REPUBLIC [1972] EA 32. The brief facts of the case are that on 29th January 2006, Joshua Ongele Siewe, PW1, the complainant herein, realized that his 16 head of cattle had been stolen from his cattle shade. He and his neighbours followed hoof marks, which led them to an area known as Ikerenge and then to Naoro. On 21st February 2006, PW1 accompanied by the area chief, John Okombo, PW4, and Police officers went to Ikerenge where he identified four of his stolen animals. They were in the home of the appellant.
Paskal Aiko, PW2, a nephew of PW1 was also in the search team and he corroborated the evidence of PW1, PW3 and PW4 also corroborated the evidence of the complainant.
In his defence, the appellant stated that between the 19th and 30th of January 2006, he had gone away from home to attend a burial of his sister. He further stated on the 22nd February 2006, the police and the complainant went to his home but did not recover any stolen animal thereat. He was however arrested and locked up in police custody. Two other people were also arrested in connection with the theft of the cattle. On 23rd February 2006, they were ordered released on condition that they produced four head of cattle which they did. He claimed that the four head of cattle purportedly recovered from him were his animals.
The trial court considered the evidence of the prosecution witnesses as well as the defence of the appellant. The court found that there was sufficient evidence to prove that the four animals that were recovered from the appellant belonged to the complainant.
The appellant, having been found in possession of the animals that were stolen from the complainant and having failed to explain and having failed to give sufficient explanation as to how he came into possession of the same, that was sufficient prove that he was one of the people who stole the complainant’s animals. His conviction was therefore proper. The sentence that was passed by the trial court cannot be said to be harsh or excessive. This appeal has no merit and I dismiss the same in its entirety.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KISII this 23rd day of April, 2008.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE
Delivered in open court in the presence of:
N/A for the appellant
Mr. Kemo, Principal State Counsel for the respondent
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE