[2022] KEHC 13896 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 13896 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any affidavit or credible evidence explaining the two-year delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time. The applicant's claim of not being supplied with court proceedings was unsubstantiated, as there was no record of any request for proceedings or judgment being...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 13896 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: SAO; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E095 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Defilement Offence, Sentence Review, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Out of Time Defilement Offence Sentence Review Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SAO

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to appeal out of time is an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any affidavit or credible evidence explaining the two-year delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time. The applicant's claim of not being supplied with court proceedings was unsubstantiated, as there was no record of any request for proceedings or judgment being denied, and the documents were available, typed, and certified. The court concluded that the application was mischievous, amounted to an abuse of court process, and that the applicant was guilty of inordinate and unexplained delay. Consequently, the application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 22/8/2022 is dismissed.
  • File closed.