[2020] KEELC 697 (KLR)
The court found that although the applicant did not seek stay in the lower court, this omission is not fatal to the present application. The court determined that the applicant, facing imminent eviction from the suit land, would suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted. The court emphasized the need to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 697 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Sarah Chepkirui Kerich; Respondent: David Taa Kiprono
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Narok
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 14 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- MN Kullow
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss, Preservation of Suit Property, Eviction, Appeal Thresholds
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Chepkirui Kerich
Appellant
David Taa Kiprono
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
- 2 Whether failure to seek stay in the lower court is fatal to the current application.
- 3 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the applicant did not seek stay in the lower court, this omission is not fatal to the present application. The court determined that the applicant, facing imminent eviction from the suit land, would suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted. The court emphasized the need to preserve the subject matter of the appeal (the suit land) pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and granted a stay of execution to prevent the appeal from being rendered nugatory.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment and decree granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAROK
ELC APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2020
SARAH CHEPKIRUI KERICH................APPELLANT/APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
DAVID TAA KIPRONO..................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
By a Notice of Motion dated 18th March, 2020 the Appellant/Applicant sought for order of stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the Applicant’s appeal. The Application is based on the grounds that the trial court did not issue any temporary stay of execution and that the conduct of the mater and the subsequent judgement of the court had caused the Applicant to be admitted in hospital and being a single mother of 5 children she has no one to physically defend her and that the applicant may commence execution proceedings and thus render her Appeal nugatory and consequently suffer loss and damage. The Application was also supported by the affidavit of the appellant.
The Application was opposed by the Respondent who had filed a replying affidavit contending that the Application does not meet the threshold for the grant of stay of execution in that the appellant does not have an arguable case with overwhelming chances of success.
The Respondent further averred that the Applicant has not proved the allegation of substantial loss she will suffer since it is the respondent who has been in occupation of the suit premises.
I have considered the application before me and the submissions by the parties this being an application for stay of execution the grounds for the grant of the same is now well settled. A party must demonstrate that he has an arguable case of appeal with probability of success, that the party will suffer substantial loss and the appeal may be rendered nugatory if the stay is not granted.
In the instant application the appellant is apprehensive that the respondent may commence execution proceeding of the judgement and hence the appeal may be rendered nugatory. The respondent contends that the appellant had not made an application for stay in the lower court and the entire application does not meet the threshold for the grant of stay of execution and thus the application be dismissed with costs. From the proceedings of the lower court it is true that there was no application made for stay in the lower court however, that does not make the instant application fatal. As whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success that is an issue that I will determine on merit and hence will not make a determination thereof and on whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss since the appeal relates to a parcel of land and the appellant is bound to be evicted if no stay is granted that will in my view cause the appellant substantive loss and thus I find that pending the hearing of the appeal there is need to preserve the suit land and consequently I will allow the notice of motion dated 18th March, 2020 as prayed and order stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in open court at NAROK on this 10th day of November, 2020
Mohammed N. Kullow
Judge
10/11/2020
In the presence of: -
CA:Chuma
Mr Korir for the Appellant/Applicant
Respondent-present